Here's a nice quote from John Pacenti's article on Judge Bandstra's R&R on Ben Kuehne:
If Bandstra’s decision stands, the case would be down to five substantive money laundering counts. Kuehne and Saldarriaga are accused of using a money broker to hide the movement of drug profits into the defense fund. The money broker was an informant working with the government and exchanging pesos for dollars used in U.S. drug stings.And us too, Jane.
Miami litigator Jane Moscowitz, one of Kuehne’s attorneys, said she was thrilled with the Bandstra ruling.
“It took my breath away that the motion had been granted,” she said.
And here's some more background on the IRS/UBS suit, which is being closely watched in financial and legal circles:
While the deferred prosecution agreement reached between Swiss banking giant UBS and federal prosecutors on Wednesday might have initially looked like a great deal for the government, in reality the Zurich-based bank isn't disclosing nearly as many client names as law enforcement officials are suggesting, says Miller & Chevalier tax partner George Clarke III.Sure, not bad for a bunch of carpetbaggers from New York. But what are we, chopped liver?
Clarke says that the decision by the Justice Department to file suit against UBS on Thursday in Miami is evidence of this.
Despite forking over $780 million in penalties as part of its deferred prosecution agreement, UBS, represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz litigation partner John Savarese, managed to secure a pretty good deal for itself, Clarke says.
1 comment:
Nice to see you here, SFL.
Post a Comment