The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
CNN has a post about Justice Thomas' stay here.
SCOTUS covers Graham's request for the stay. And here is Georgia's response.
Of course, it's time to get rid of grand juries altogether. They don't serve as protection for citizens in any respect and are simply a tool used by prosecutors to investigate and lock witnesses in. A complete waste of resources if the goal is to act as a barrier between prosecutors and an indictment.
The City of Miami has been sued for an "illegal" parking tax. It's a class action. One of the named plaintiffs? Criminal defense attorney Richard Klugh, who's now taking the good fight to the civil side of a court docket. The Miami Herald covers the case here (if you can make it through the pay wall....).
The 11th Circuit is now going to audio stream all oral arguments. The announcement is here:
The Court is pleased to announce oral arguments held in open court in all court locations will be live streamed – audio only – beginning October 25, 2022. The live stream may be accessed through the Court’s website (www.ca11.uscourts.gov). Audio recordings of oral arguments held in open court will continue to be posted on the Court’s website. Oral arguments in national security cases and other cases not heard publicly will not be live streamed and recordings of those arguments will not be posted on the Court’s website.
More and more multidistrict litigations (MDLs) are coming to our district. They’re often complicated and a lot of work goes into them, so, when the Joint Panel on Multi-District Litigation (JPML) assigns one to a judge, it’s considered an honor. The JPML is composed of federal judges from each Circuit selected by Chief Justice Roberts. They hold quarterly argument on whether to create a new MDL and, if so, where to send it. It's often a very big deal in the world of federal civil litigation.
Some districts and judges are frequently assigned MDLs and come to be regarded as "MDL Districts" and "MDL Judges." As an example, Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida is on her second major mass tort MDL (this one about 3M earplugs) and is considered by many to be an "MDL Judge." (In 3M several of our SDFLA judges have travelled to Pensacola and presided over bellwether trials.)
The SDFLA has 7 pending (open) MDLs now (listing them below, oldest to newest, with a short summary on what they’re about; some are fairly old and probably not all that active). In terms of sheer numbers, we’re about in the middle of the pack, nationally. We should move up in the next few years. It would also be great to get one of our judges on the JPML (we’ve never had one serve on the JPML).
I'm going to try and blog more about the interesting aspects of MDLs, particularly as they relate to the SDFL and 11th Circuit.
Judge | Case Name | Case No. | Summary |
Kenneth A. Marra | In re: Chiquita Brands International, Inc. | MDL-1916 | Victims contend that Chiquita funneled approximately 1.7 million dollars to the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, a Colombian terrorist organization, during the Colombian civil war. |
James Lawrence King | In re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation | MDL-2036 | Customers challenging the overdraft fees charged by the federally chartered banks on the ground that the charges were exorbitant |
Federico Moreno | In re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation | MDL-2599 | Takata made airbags for various car makers. Plaintiffs alleged they exploded, killing or injuring people. |
K. Michael Moore | Liquid Toppings Dispensing System (Patent Litigation) | MDL-2832 | Kona Ice--that company that sells shaved ice from trucks with a penguin on it--alleged the competitors stole their topping dispensing system. |
Darrin P. Gayles | In re: MONAT Hair Care Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation | MDL-2841 | Claim is that products that were supposed to promote healthy hair growth did the opposite, causing hair loss and scalp irritation. |
Robin L. Rosenberg | In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation | MDL-2924 | Claim is that ranitidine—an ingredient in Zantac and other heartburn drugs—causes cancer and that drug manufacturers knew it. |
Cecilia M. Altonaga | In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation | MDL-2989 | Litigation over Robin Hood Securities’ handling of “meme stocks”—stocks whose price is being mostly driven by social media postings. |
Rodolfo A. Ruiz | In re: Mednax Services, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation | MDL -2994 | Mednax (now called Pediatrix) is a company in the health care space. In June 2020, its e-mail system was breached, potentially compromising the personally identifiable and health-related information of nearly two million individuals. Lawsuits ensued. |
Raag Singhal | In re: Johnson & Johnson Sunscreen Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation | MDL-3015 | Claim is that sunscreen manufactured by J&J defendants contained excessive amounts of benzene, a carcinogen linked to leukemia and other cancers. |
A lot of South Florida connections to the ongoing DOJ investigation into Trump’s handling of classified documents. Last Thursday, one of our district’s alums, Kash Patel, reportedly appeared before the grand jury. Patel was an AFPD down here before rising to high level positions within the Trump administration (the last being Chief of Staff to the Secretary of Defense).
According to reports about the investigation, no charging decision will be made before the November elections.
Fallout continues from the death penalty phase of the Parkland shooter. The Sun Sentinel covers recent court rulings on Florida’s death penalty here. Before 2016, Florida law allowed just a majority of jurors to recommend the death penalty to a judge. In Hurst v. Fla., 577 U.S. 92 (2016), the Supreme Court overturned that law in an 8-1 decision. Although Florida law now requires a unanimous jury vote recommending death, there is talk of changing the law (Alabama allows a 10-2 vote, for example).
We've had this debate on the blog for many years, and there is no good solution.
We all just wanted judges who are hard-working, nice, fair and will grant a continuance!
Well, there are 5 judges on the Florida Supreme Court who are up for "retention," which means they can be voted out. But that never happens. Here's an article from the Tampa Bay Times that discusses what's up:
Five of the seven sitting justices on the Florida Supreme Court are on the November ballot for a retention vote..
Florida’s Supreme Court justices are appointed by the governor. But voters decide whether the justices should be retained; such votes are conducted in the first general election that occurs more than a year after a justice’s appointment, and again every six years.
The state’s highest court has the final say in some of the major issues facing Floridians. That includes final orders imposing the death penalty, district court decisions declaring a provision of the state Constitution or a statute invalid, certain orders from the Public Service Commission on utility rates or services, and issues that it decides are of great public importance, such as whether the privacy clause in the state’s Constitution includes abortion
Imagine if a criminal defendant or his lawyer refused to follow court orders or the law. They'd be put in jail before you could say not guilty.
But BOP does its own thing and really doesn't care much for the judiciary or the legislature. In fact, it still refuses to follow the First Step Act
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is under new leadership but it is still suffering from decades of mismanagement. BOP Director Colette Peters began work on August 2nd of this year taking over for the Michael Carvajal. The U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations held a hearing on July 26 chaired by Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) who grilled outgoing BOP Director Carvajal about the failings throughout the agency. While the hearing was focused on the corruption and abuses at USP Atlanta, it was a condemnation of an agency in crisis.
Director Peters testified on September 29, 2022 in from the Senate Judiciary Committee. Unlike Carvajal’s previous, contentious testimonies before the same committee during his tenure, Peters’ was marked by cordiality and encouragement to implement the First Step Act legislation, uncover corruption among staff and provide transparency to an agency that U.S. Senator Ron Johnson had previously described as one where “People have not been held accountable.”
The First Step Act (FSA) was signed into law in December 2018. It is considered one of the most influential pieces of legislation directed at the BOP to not only encourage prisoners to participate in meaningful programs meant to rehabilitate, but to reduce the number of people in prison who pose little or no danger to society. Senator Dick Durbin was frustrated in Peters’ testimony stating that the full effects of FSA had not been implemented nearly 4 years after it being signed into law. Peters assured the Senators that an auto-calculator was completed in August 2022 that provided FSA credits to prisoners which had the effect of reducing many sentences. However, that auto-calculator was not in place at the time of the hearing, or at least it was not communicated to prisoners or the public.
According to dozens of prisoners I interviewed for this piece, calculations were not communicated to them nor reflected on BOP.gov, which tracks release dates for federal prisoners. Anticipating this computer program’s rollout that would reduce many prisoner release dates, prisoners and their families eagerly awaited the news of when they would be going home. As the weeks passed after after August, prisoners still had no news. It was not until the week of October 3rd that FSA credits started to be applied. As one prisoner told me, “I was expecting a year of credits and I got 4 months. I have no idea what happened.”
What happened is that the calculator still has errors in it. Prisoners who were transferred to a halfway house after receiving an interim calculation of their sentence, were called in and told they would be returning to prison after the new calculation took away their year. Colitha Bush, had only been in a halfway house for a few weeks when the director of her Houston facility called her and said, “I hope you’re sitting down,” Bush told me in an interview that the director told her that it had received a new sentence calculation from the BOP and she was now not due to be released until April 2024. Colitha said, “I couldn’t believe that they were going to send me back to prison after I took all those classes and did what the First Step Act required.” The following day, Colitha went into the halfway house and was informed that the BOP had corrected her date, and she could stay home. “I was relieved but the last 24 hours was pure hell thinking that I was going back,” Bush said. Bush was not the only person to receive a revised date, some of the prisoners whose sentences were commuted by President Joe Biden had their dates recalculated to state a date in the future. One of those whose sentenced was commuted but had her date recalculated said that she was concerned enough to make a few calls to make sure it was not true. Her date was corrected also.
