It was a fun week in San Francisco (I can't believe I missed the Father CutiƩ drama)...
I see the blog was in good hands while I was away. Rick was great and we hope to have him back on a regular basis.
Just a couple of quick hits before we get going for the week:
-- The Liberty City 6 jury (the latest version of it) will continue deliberating this week. That case is truly jinxed... (In his post on last week's LC6 happenings, Rick missed Mike Tein -- who, of course, is the most quotable lawyer in the District -- from the Blum article: "What a shameful waste of our taxes at the worst possible time. Just think what $10 million could have done for our schoolchildren in Liberty City.")
-- The District now has a Wiki page. It's interesting to look at the historical makeup of the Court. (Some trivia pointed out on the page: "This federal district has the dubious distinction of having had more judges removed through impeachment than any other district, with a total of two, one-third of all federal district judges so removed.")
-- Justice O'Connor had this to say about judicial elections: "They're awful. I hate them." More here.
-- Rick posted on the FIU faculty vote for Dean, and FIU law professor Howard Wasserman has a lot to say about the vote and the coverage here. Howard criticizes the open proceedings and compares it to watching sausages being made. Gotta disagree with Howard here -- we wanna know how sausages are made. Open proceedings are a good thing. Better to have the press in there and reporting (even if the coverage in this case wasn't complete) than the alternative of having the doors closed.
-- Rumpole demonstrates why the Ben Kuehne case needs to be dismissed.
6 comments:
Is the Herald going to write about how these liberty city lawyers are on 10 minute standby all day, every day. How are they supposed to practice?
Not relevant, but... I took the entrance exam more than two weeks ago. At the time, they announced that we would hear from them by last Friday if we failed and receive a certificate in the mail four weeks after the exam date if we passed. Do they generally hold to their deadlines? No phone call yes, so can I pop the champagne?
11:21: what entrance exam? Who is "they"?
Now that David is back, I that the regular posters (who were terrified by Ricardo's intellectual rantings) will return and begin anew.
See, perfect example...bad Grammar, incomprehensible point...all the trappings of the old posters.
12:28... The exam to be an attorney in the Southern District. They was whoever the guy with the beard was who proctored the exam. Must be from the Clerk's office. I have no idea.
Post a Comment