And the Supreme Court decided a double jeopardy case this morning, Bravo-Fernandez:
The issue-preclusion component of the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar the Government from retrying defendants, like petitioners, after a jury has returned irreconcilably inconsistent verdicts of conviction and acquittal and the convictions are later vacated for legal error unrelated to the inconsistency.
2 comments:
Illuminating
http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/11/argument-analysis-court-wrestles-with-vagueness-and-retroactivity-in-sentencing-context/#more-249342
Analysis of OA from Scotusblog. "At the end of the argument, it seemed doubtful Beckles will prevail."
Post a Comment