Here is the opinion
The Eleventh Circuit is affirmed. The case is remanded; Justice Kagan writes for the Court. Vote is six to three. Roberts dissents, joined by Sotomayor and Breyer. Very interesting lineup.
Will write more when I have had a chance to read it, but here is the holding:
When challenging the legality of a §853(e)(1) pre-trial asset seizure, a criminal defendant who has been indicted is not constitutionally entitled to contest a grand jury’s determination of probable causeto believe the defendant committed the crimes charged.
The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
3 comments:
Wonder if she'll get the PD now.
Thomas is so cool, opinions are like ____________ , everybody has one, except Thomas
Let's be honest: in most -- perhaps all -- cases, an AFPD is just as good -- if not better -- than a high-priced private attorney. Kaley is really much ado about very little.
Post a Comment