But Suter was also substantive. For example, he predicted that the exclusionary rule would be abolished in the near term. He reasoned that the exclusionary rule was not as necessary any longer because police are better trained than they used to be.
He also made predictions about the affirmative action case, and said that if the case was remanded for strict scrutiny analysis that it would have a hard time getting back before the Supreme Court because Justice Kagan was recused.
Judge Graham asked him about cameras in the courtroom and explained that no one had taken advantage of the pilot program here in his division the SDFLA. Suter was not in favor of cameras, saying Congress should pass a budget first and that cameras would demean the Court. He also said no one would watch. Not a convincing argument for me, but that seems to be the feeling of the Court.
I asked him if he read SCOTUSBlog. He said yes, he needed to find out what was going on in the Court every morning. Good stuff.
1 comment:
the TRIALMASTER does not give a rat's ass what this guy has to say or thinks. Need better speakers who are relevant.
Post a Comment