Friday, August 19, 2011

Judge makes mistake and goes after criminal defense lawyer

This story really amazes me:

At issue: Anthony pleaded guilty to 13 charges in a check fraud case in January 2010. Judge Stan Strickland sentenced her to time-served in jail, and a year of probation after her jail release.

But last month, when Anthony was acquitted of murder and released from the Orange County Jail, she wasn't put on probation. The Department of Corrections said Anthony served that probation in jail while she was awaiting the murder trial.

Soon after her release, Strickland amended his original order clarifying his intentions, which were clear in video and transcripts from the January 2010 sentencing.

Anthony's defense team objected, and Perry heard arguments from attorneys earlier this month.

Perry asked the defense team if they knew Anthony was serving her probation while she was in jail. One of Anthony's attorneys admitted that they did, but didn't think it was their burden to notify the court.

Perry eventually issued an order stating Anthony does have to report to probation.

In that order, Perry took up the issue with the attorneys too, saying that, "the failure to abide by that order and the failure to notify the court of a known scrivener's error in the order may be a violation of an attorney's duty of candor."

"No attorney should conduct himself or herself in a way that impedes an order of the court. ... Our system of justice should never be in the position of rewarding someone who willfully hides the ball."


This investigation reminds me of the old F. Lee Bailey quote after he was charged with mail fraud: In England, a criminal defense lawyer is apt to be knighted, in America, he is apt to be indicted.

This is especially true where the criminal defense lawyer is representing an unpopular defendant like Casey. The Florida Bar should quickly clear Jose Baez.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Judge Perry misses the point. When a judge issues an order differing from what may appear to be his original intent at a hearing, the order stands because the judge has the prerogative of changing his mind before the order is issued ... many cases on this issue. The burden was on the prosecution, not the defense, to seek clarification ... which they did not do. So the blame lies with the prosecutor, not Baez.

Muskegon Lawyer said...

Working in legal is not that simple. As a client, it is best that you consider several important things upon choosing a criminal defense lawyer. Choose an attorney who has been establishing his practice for a long period. His heaps of experience will certainly help you a lot in your trial.