Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Hoeveler assigns homework

So what to do when a law clerk hears a sitting juror bitching on the phone about her service, the other jurors, and saying that she had already made up her mind to convict the defendant? Judge Hoeveler kicked the juror off and then gave her an interesting homework assignment: he told her to read an eight-page printout of an article from the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy by Manhattan lawyer Gerald Walpin. Title is "America's Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice.'' Hoeveler told the juror to give him a written summary -- within 15 days. "I want you to read that thoroughly. . . . Then write me a letter telling me what you think of it and what you think of the jury system.'' Juror is Kimberly Branam-Callahan Cipolato, who was represented by Joel Kaplan. She's a legal secretary at Duarte & Ariz in Coral Gables. Hoeveler's law clerk is Mandana Dashtaki, 26 year old Harvard grad. Read the whole article by Joan Fleischman here.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

According to the column, the juror intended to find the defendant not guilty!

David Oscar Markus said...

The column did say that, but I've heard the opposite. Anyone know what really happened?

Anonymous said...

Perhaps I'm a bit cynical, but do jurors who intend to vote guilty ever get thrown off a jury?

Anonymous said...

Do you think that Judge Hoeveler would not have thrown her off if her vote was guilty? Really?

Anonymous said...

Of course not. But, do you ever hear stories about jurors who are inclined to vote guilty being kicked off a jury? On the other hand, stories are legion about not guilty jurors being given the boot.

Anonymous said...

Why are criminal defense lawyers whining and posting anonymously?