The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley...
We are losing a gem of a judge. I recently tried a case with Judge Hurley and he loves being a judge and trying cases. That's evident from being in trial for a month with him. He is courteous to the lawyers and treats both sides with complete respect -- and he is a thoughtful judge. He calls em right down the middle.
We all wish him well.
So, any bets on who President Obama will appoint for that spot?
Ho Hum -- The Princess, A Sex Sting, and UBS
Yep, still foolin' around while David tries another big case.
So I told you all this UBS thing was big. Here's an update on what went down in Judge Gold's courtroom yesterday:
U.S. District Judge Alan S. Gold set a July 13 hearing on the IRS lawsuit, unless an agreement is reached first. UBS claims that turning over the account names would violate Swiss privacy law and jeopardize the bank's license to stay in business.Most judges probably would appreciate that.
"Such violations would expose these (UBS) employees to substantial prison terms, as well as fines, penalties and other sanctions," the UBS lawyers said in a court filing last week. "There is simply no reason to have, nor equity in having, such an expedited process here."
The IRS had sought an accelerated timetable, but Justice Department tax attorney Stuart Gibson and UBS lawyers told Gold at a brief telephone hearing Monday they had agreed on a lengthier process. Gold also set a series of deadlines for court filings.
"I would appreciate the continued efforts to discuss this matter, to narrow down what the legal issues are and the factual issues are," Gold said.
What do you know -- the feds bust a Miami Beach sex ring:
Smart move, I wouldn't say anything either if my client was facing these kind of allegations.Bernabe-Caballero, 34, remained without bond in Miami's Federal Detention Center Monday night and was scheduled for a 10 a.m. hearing Tuesday about extradition to Michigan, where the grand jury in the case had convened.
Bernabe-Caballero's attorney, Rene A. Sotorrio, declined to comment.
And -- can you believe it -- a story about a cocaine princess and federal court.
Sometimes these things write themselves.
Monday, February 23, 2009
More on Kuehne R&R
Here's a nice quote from John Pacenti's article on Judge Bandstra's R&R on Ben Kuehne:
If Bandstra’s decision stands, the case would be down to five substantive money laundering counts. Kuehne and Saldarriaga are accused of using a money broker to hide the movement of drug profits into the defense fund. The money broker was an informant working with the government and exchanging pesos for dollars used in U.S. drug stings.And us too, Jane.
Miami litigator Jane Moscowitz, one of Kuehne’s attorneys, said she was thrilled with the Bandstra ruling.
“It took my breath away that the motion had been granted,” she said.
And here's some more background on the IRS/UBS suit, which is being closely watched in financial and legal circles:
While the deferred prosecution agreement reached between Swiss banking giant UBS and federal prosecutors on Wednesday might have initially looked like a great deal for the government, in reality the Zurich-based bank isn't disclosing nearly as many client names as law enforcement officials are suggesting, says Miller & Chevalier tax partner George Clarke III.Sure, not bad for a bunch of carpetbaggers from New York. But what are we, chopped liver?
Clarke says that the decision by the Justice Department to file suit against UBS on Thursday in Miami is evidence of this.
Despite forking over $780 million in penalties as part of its deferred prosecution agreement, UBS, represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz litigation partner John Savarese, managed to secure a pretty good deal for itself, Clarke says.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Another one bites the dust
Is It Friday Already?
Boy the federal court beat is...a little beat today.
Does it count as SD FL news that I saw Judge Moreno having a nice lunch at La Loggia yesterday?
No, guess not -- darn, where's Julie Kay when you need her?
Anyways, the always-in-trial big man already updated us on Joe Cool. Judge Huck set sentencing for May 6.
Third time's the charm in the Liberty 6 retrial, which is starting to feel like Jarndyce and Jarndyce -- only longer.
What do you all think of this line from the defense opening:
“This case is a 100 percent setup; this is a manufactured crime,” the lawyer, Ana M. Jhones, said in her opening argument, which drew several objections from the prosecution, most notably when she remarked that “taking an oath to Al Qaeda is not a crime.”True, but do must jurors think it should be?
And finally, more details on the IRS v. UBS showdown unfolding right here in sunny South Florida:
Anyone know who has been retained to represent UBS on this? I know a certain humble blogger who's available.With today’s lawsuit, the U.S. asked a federal judge to enforce its so-called John Doe summonses. On July 1, a federal judge in Miami approved an IRS summons seeking information on thousands of UBS accounts owned or controlled by U.S. citizens. Negotiations between the U.S., Switzerland and UBS have been at a standstill since then, according to a Justice Department filing.
UBS said in a statement that it expected today’s filing.
“UBS believes it has substantial defenses” to the U.S. attempt to enforce the summonses and will “vigorously contest” the case, the bank said in the statement. The bank’s objections are based on U.S. laws, Swiss financial privacy laws, and a 2001 agreement between UBS and the IRS, according to the statement.
Have a great weekend all!