The South Florida Federal JNC is:
Vivian de las Cuevas-Diaz
Larry Handfield
Retired Judge Ilona Holmes
Eduardo Lacasa
Victoria Mesa-Estrada
Burnadette Norris-Weeks
Retired Justice Barbara Pariente
The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
The South Florida Federal JNC is:
Vivian de las Cuevas-Diaz
Larry Handfield
Retired Judge Ilona Holmes
Eduardo Lacasa
Victoria Mesa-Estrada
Burnadette Norris-Weeks
Retired Justice Barbara Pariente
In Texas prisons, food is so bad the staff are finding mold on it. This photo came w/a leaked email a shocked official sent to every unit.
— Keri Blakinger (@keribla) March 3, 2021
“If there is mold on the bread don’t make a sandwich w/it,” he wrote.
Here’s a THREAD on more internal emails abt the food situation. pic.twitter.com/JyMmUUb7BF
Typically a federal trial about election law doesn't involve extramarital affairs, the National Enquirer, and a Presidential candidate. You'll get all of that in today's episode of For The Defense, in which I discuss the John Edwards trial with the great Abbe Lowell. You can check it out on Apple, Spotify and Google, All other platforms can be accessed on our website.
That's the title of this nice piece about Judge Altman in the DBR. Here's a cool shout-out to his grandfather:
And when Altman had one of his last conversations with his grandfather in Caracas, Venezuela, those American historical figures and what they stood for was the basis of a topic of discussion. At the time, his grandfather was dying from cancer. The two men were playing several games of chess on the balcony of his grandfather’s apartment overlooking tens of thousands of protestors.
That afternoon was a few weeks after Hugo Chávez, the president of the island nation in which corruption had become increasingly more widespread, padded the Venezuelan Supreme Court with loyalists in his party so he could seek unlimited terms in office.
Altman expressed to his grandfather his intentions to apply to law school as people took to the streets to protest the “gross violation of their constitutional charter.”
“One of the last things my grandfather said was: ‘This is what happens to a country when good people don’t serve it. When the worst people become public servants. If you’re going to be a lawyer, remember to be the right kind of lawyer that serves its country, so this never happens in America,’ ” Altman recounted. “ I carried those words with me. That story was my essay for my application to Yale Law School.”
And as Altman was nearing graduation from Yale in New Haven, Connecticut, he had no doubt in his mind that he wanted to return to Miami to start his legal career.
“This is the community that brought my family in when we came here from Venezuela,” Altman said. “We built a life here, we built friendships here, and I owed this community, I still do, for taking us in.”
He posts his 10 Rules here, which he says apply via Zoom or in person. I like them. Check them out, especially young lawyers. One quibble with Rule #4 -- are you really standing up during Zoom court?
Updated -- one rule Rumpole should think about adding is that clients shouldn't show up while performing surgery. This plastic surgeon thought it was a good idea to appear for trial during while his unconscious patient was on the operating table.
Speaking of Zoom court, I'd like to see the statistics for Zoom sentencings. Are judges giving more significant downward variances because of the pandemic? Or are sentences higher because it's harder to humanize the client over Zoom?
My experience has been that most judges recognize the difficulties in presenting arguments during a Zoom sentencing as well as the challenges of custodial sentences. They have been giving the "Zoom discount." It depends, of course... for some judges, it's business as usual. But overall, I have seen better (lower) sentences over the past year.
My hope is that these slightly lower sentences start to become normalized and don't change once the pandemic is over. If Biden can prioritize judges and appoint some progressives to the bench, we may even start to see real change in sentencing. Let's see.
Sentencing Guru Douglas Berman writes about it here. From his conclusion:
Diverse nominees to the Commission should help ensure this agency pursues an ambitious reform agenda. But President Biden should also expressly request the Commission conduct a comprehensive assessment of the entire federal sentencing system—and perhaps even our whole nation’s many sentencing systems—with a particular focus on modern mass incarceration and mass punishment. The American Law Institute’s recent revision of the Model Penal Code’s sentencing provisions wisely recommends that sentencing commissions regularly “perform an omnibus review of the sentencing system,” which should include “a comparative review of the experiences of other jurisdictions with similar sentencing and corrections systems.” An across-the-board review of the federal sentencing system is long overdue, and the U.S. Sentencing Commission has the staff and resources needed to conduct a systematic, evidence-based nationwide analysis in order to identify those modern sentencing systems and practices that best advance public safety and equitable justice while minimizing the number of persons subject to penal custody and supervision.
Calls for reviving and reorienting the work of the U.S. Sentencing Commission are coming from many quarters: a task force of the Council on Criminal Justice has stressed the need to “reinvigorate the U.S. Sentencing Commission,” for example, and the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force on Criminal Justice Reform recommended that the Commission be tasked “with conducting a comprehensive review” of federal sentencing law and practices. But even with a chorus of voices and strong political will for significant sentencing reforms, President Biden must prioritize making appointments that can enable the U.S. Sentencing Commission to effectively lead the way.
That's a question that should be asked of all potential candidates for U.S. Attorney. In SDNY, for example, the office has dismissed cases where there is misconduct, even after a conviction (unlike here). From the WaPo:
Federal prosecutors in New York acknowledged telling a “flat lie” to a criminal defendant’s legal team while trying to downplay their mishandling of evidence in the botched trial of a businessman accused of violating U.S. sanctions on Iran.
The embarrassing revelations about what many consider the U.S.’ top criminal investigating office were contained in a dozens of private text messages, transcripts, and correspondence unsealed Monday, over the objection of prosecutors, at the request of The Associated Press.
The release of the records followed a ruling last week in which U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan urged the Justice Department to open an internal probe into possible misconduct by prosecutors in the terrorism and international narcotics unit in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.
While Judge Nathan found no evidence that prosecutors intentionally withheld evidence from lawyers representing an Iranian banker, Ali Sadr Hashemi Nejad, she said they made a “deliberate attempt to obscure” the truth and attempted to “bury” a key document that might have helped the defense.
The mistakes were serious enough that even after winning a conviction, prosecutors dropped all charges against Sadr.
The whole article is worth a read as it details incredible, but not uncommon, misconduct. The New York judge was upset with the government and urged OPR to investigate. We know what OPR will do. But at least SDNY dismissed after the jury verdict of guilt. That's not true in other officers or especially here, where there is a long line of misconduct cases, which the office tries to defend even after misconduct is exposed. It will be interesting to see if that changes under the new administration.
So, hopeful U.S. Attorney candidates -- feel free to email me your plan to address prosecutorial misconduct and I will post your answer in full.
In the meantime, we still need judges to check prosecutors when they cross the line.
Today's episode of For The Defense is a doozy. Cutting off ears, death angels, and a Temple of Love. Another day at the office in Miami’s Justice Building where Jayne Weintraub defended Yahweh Ben Yahweh who some called a cult-leader and others called a savior. You can check it out on Apple, Spotify and Google, All other platforms can be accessed on our website.