The 24 interviews will be narrowed to 10 recommendations to the 2 Florida Senators. They will then recommend 5 to the White House.DAY ONE November 28, 20179:00 am Benjamin Greenberg9:40 am Migna Sanchez-Llorens10:20 am Rodney Smith11:00 am John Thornton11:40 am Marina Garcia Wood12:15 – 1:00 pm LUNCH1:00 pm Angel Cortinas1:40 pm John Kastrenakes2:20 pm Orlando Prescott3:00 pm Melissa Visconti3:40 pm Beatrice Butchko4:20 pm Raag Singhal5:00 pm Antonio ArzolaDAY TWO November 29, 20179:00 am Roy Altman9:40 am Thomas Rebull10:20 am Michael Sherwin11:00 am Dina Keever-Agrama11:40 am Daryl Trawick12:15 – 1:00 pm LUNCH1:00 pm William Roby1:40 pm Peter Lopez2:20 pm Jeffrey Colbath3:00 pm David Haimes3:40 pm Rodolfo Ruiz4:20 pm Mark Klingensmith5:00 pm Meenu Sasser
The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
Friday, October 27, 2017
JNC schedules interviews for Federal District Judge
The Federal JNC has scheduled interviews for Federal District Judge as follows:
Thursday, October 26, 2017
Finalists for the two Magistrate Positions
Finalists for the two Magistrate Positions are:
Miami:
Lynn Kirkpatrick, Lauren Louis, Gera Peoples, Steven Petri, and Erica Zaron
West Palm Beach:
Panayotta Agustin-Birch, Celeste Higgins, Stephanie Moon, Steven Petri, and Bruce Reinhart
Miami:
Lynn Kirkpatrick, Lauren Louis, Gera Peoples, Steven Petri, and Erica Zaron
West Palm Beach:
Panayotta Agustin-Birch, Celeste Higgins, Stephanie Moon, Steven Petri, and Bruce Reinhart
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Judge William Pryor reviews book on Justice Scalia
11th Circuit Judge and SCOTUS short-lister, William Pryor, wrote this review of "Scalia Speaks" for Law360. Here's a snippet:
Scalia’s famous literary style shines on every page. Consider, for example, his colorful description of his “intense dislike” of legal canards — that is, “oft-repeated statements that he [wa]s condemned to read, again and again, in the reported cases.” Scalia complained, “It gets to be a kind of Chinese water torture: one’s intelligence strapped down helplessly by the bonds of stare decisis that require these cases to be read, and trickled upon, time after time, by certain ritual errors, vapidities, and non sequiturs.”
Or consider his vivid description of the remote injury caused by a package of fireworks to a railroad passenger in a famous legal case: “And when the package landed on the rails, there resulted a rather large pyrotechnic explosion, which caused a set of scales a considerable distance away on the far end of the platform to fall over, and to land on top of poor Mrs. Palsgraf, who was injured.”
The collection even offers advice from the late justice to Scribes: The American Society of Legal Writers about the “time and sweat” necessary to become a good writer: that is, one who has what the justice called “the ability to place oneself in the shoes of one’s audience; to assume only what they assume; to anticipate what they anticipate; to explain what they need explained; to think what they must be thinking; to feel what they must be feeling.” That advice came when the society unsurprisingly honored the justice with a lifetime achievement award.
Scalia’s wit also offers laughs at every turn. To the Friendly Sons of St. Patrick in New York City, Scalia explained “the best formula for after-dinner speeches being what one of the Jesuits I had in high school advised was the best advice for kissing among unmarried couples: leviter, breviter.” In a crack about the education of new Catholic priests, Scalia then deadpanned, “For the younger clergy in the audience, that is Latin for ‘lightly and briefly.’” And then after what must have been a pause, he delivered the punch line: “I have reason to believe that that advice has been no more effective for after-dinner speakers than it has been for unmarried couples.”
The next week he spoke to B’nai B’rith in the nation’s capital, where he recalled his speech to the Friendly Sons the week before and said, “Washington is becoming more and more like New York. Just last Wednesday I was at the dinner for the Friendly Sons of St. Patrick, and here I am at B’nai B’rith. As Irving Kristol said some years ago, in reference to a Jewish mayor of Dublin, ‘Only in America!’” And then there’s Scalia’s description of one his “most humbling moments” as a turkey hunter: “I took a shot at a gobbler and he went right down — flapped a little and went down. I was so excited, I jumped out of the box stand and hurried to him. I got about five feet away and he lifted his head, looked at me, and ran away.” Scalia then explained, “And I had left my gun back in the box stand.”
Monday, October 23, 2017
Another (fake?) bomb plot uncovered in SDFLA
Another (fake?) bomb plot was uncovered in the Southern District of Florida. The FBI arrested Vincente Solano for attempting to blow up the Dolphin Mall. The FBI was tipped off by a confidential informant and then provided Solano a fake bomb. Solano will make his first appearance in front of Magistrate Judge McAliley today.
Going back to the controversial Liberty City 7 case, the FBI has made a number of these types of arrests. The Miami Herald mentions some of the convictions here:
Going back to the controversial Liberty City 7 case, the FBI has made a number of these types of arrests. The Miami Herald mentions some of the convictions here:
In recent years, the U.S. attorney’s office in Miami has obtained convictions against Harlem Suarez, a Key West man who plotted to blow up a bomb on a public beach while supporting a foreign terrorist organization, and James Medina, a Hollywood man who tried to bomb a synagogue in Aventura. Suarez, 25, was sentenced to life in prison. Medina, 41, faces a 25-year prison term at his sentencing in November.
Sunday, October 22, 2017
First round of Magistrate interviews this week.
The first round of interviews for the two magistrate slots (one in WPB and one in Miami) are this week. After the committee narrows the field, the judges will then conduct their interviews. The process, however, is very secretive. For example, there is no public list of who received interviews. The district court process has been much more open with requests for applicants, etc. It's a time of change in the District -- in the next 6 months, we should have a new U.S. Attorney, two new magistrates, and possibly 5 new judges. If one of those 5 judges is Michael Caruso, we will also need a new Federal Defender. Thanks to everyone for the tips that keep coming in... it's very helpful. It's also important for the public to be able to see how people are chosen for these positions.
Thursday, October 19, 2017
Why are there so few oral arguments?
The National Law Journal is covering the story of the vanishing oral argument. It's not just trials that are going away, but appellate advocacy is dying as well. For example, the 11th Circuit hears oral argument in less than 20% of its cases. That's just AWFUL. From the NLJ:
Martin chaired the appellate academy's task force and initiative on oral argument. Hoping to spark a discussion with the Judicial Conference of the United States, the judiciary's policymaking arm, he sent copies of the academy's report this summer to Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and to the chief judges of the U.S. federal appeals courts.
The academy has become concerned about the decline in the number of cases, particularly in the federal courts, that are scheduled for oral argument and the shrinking time allotted for their argument. The task force examined oral argument practices in the federal circuits and conducted a statistical analysis to evaluate the frequency of arguments and the types of cases being argued.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b) begins with "oral argument must be allowed in every case," subject to certain exceptions. But the task force's statistics showed that oral argument in many circuits instead are either not being allowed or are otherwise not being scheduled. The overall average percentages of oral arguments in the circuit courts, excluding the Federal Circuit, ranged from the mid-teens (Third, Fourth, Sixth and Eleventh) to the low 30s (First, Second and Tenth) and to 45 percent (Seventh) and 55 percent (D.C. Circuit). The lowest was the Fourth Circuit, which heard oral argument in only 11 percent of its cases.
Monday, October 16, 2017
"Finally, there is good ol’ common sense."
"Finally, there is good ol’ common sense." That's the 11th Circuit's newest judge, Kevin Newsom, who is quickly making a name for himself as a folksy, fun writer. From the intro to this opinion:
It is hornbook law that rights of all kinds—even constitutional ones—can be waived. For instance, a criminal defendant might for one reason or another elect to waive his Fourth Amendment freedom from unreasonable searches, his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, or his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel. In the same way, a civil litigant can waive his Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial or his right, rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment, to be free from overbroad assertions of personal jurisdiction. So too, a sovereign State may choose to waive its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit.
This case also concerns waiver—but not of some fundamental constitutional guarantee. Rather, this case is about … the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, affectionately (and hereinafter) known as “ERISA.” In particular, this interlocutory appeal requires us to determine whether a defendant is capable of expressly waiving the six-year statute of repose contained in ERISA Section 413(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1)—or whether instead, the protection provided by Section 1113(1) is so essential, so fundamental, that it (seemingly almost alone among personal rights) is inherently indefeasible and unwaivable.
We won’t bury the lede. In response to the district court’s certified question, we answer yes—Section 1113(1)’s statute of repose is subject to express waiver.
Complete list of District Court Applicants
In case you missed Friday's post, here is a complete list of the 45 applicants for the 5 open District Court seats in the Southern District of Florida (which will all be in the "Northern Division" -- i.e., Broward, Palm Beach, and Ft. Pierce):
1. Altman, Roy 2. Angueira, Roberto 3. Arzola, Antonio 4. Blumstein, Mark 5. Bonner, Robert 6. Brown, Richard 7. Butchko, Beatrice 8. Caruso, Michael 9. Colbath, Jeffrey 10. Cooperstein, Theodore 11. Cortinas, Angel 12. Davis, Michael 13. Day, Timothy 14. Greenberg, Benjamin 15. Haimes, David 16. Harwin, Michael 17. Haury, William 18. Hemming, Norman 19. 20. Keever-Agrama, Dina 21. Klingensmith, Mark 22. Koenig, Timothy 23. Lopez, Peter 24. Manalich, Ramiro 25. Marzen, Chad 26. McCawley, Sigrid 27. Meek, Leslie 28. Morris, Tinesha 29. Muniz, Michael Prescott, Orlando 31. Rebull, Thomas 32. Ruiz, Rodolfo 33. Sanchez-Llorens, Migna 34. Sasser, Meenu 35. Sherwin, Michael 36. Singhal, Raag 37. Smith, Rodney 38. Thornton, John 39. Trawick, Daryl 40. Villafana, Ann Maria 41. Visconti, Melissa 42. Ward, Kimberly
43. Roby, Willliam 44. Williams, Dwayne 45 Wood, Marina Garcia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)