2. That said, Jay Wexler (a former Ginsburg clerk) has this awesome article in Salon. Here's what he had to say about writing opinions:
Third, the clerks usually write a first draft of the opinions that their justice has been assigned to write. Some people find this shocking, but it really is not that big a deal. At least in Justice Ginsburg’s chambers, the boss would give us a detailed outline to work from and then, once we turned in our drafts, totally rewrite them. The best you could really hope for as a clerk is to get a little pet phrase or goofy word or other quirky something-or-other into the final opinion. For example, there may or may not be one Ginsburg opinion from our term which, when read backward, will summon the demon Beelzebub from the seventh level of hell to earth where he will horribly murder the entire human race. On a more innocuous note, when Justice Anthony Kennedy was assigned to write an opinion concerning the import tariffs applicable to permanent press pants baked in giant pants ovens in Mexico, my co-clerk Bill and I worked very hard to convince the Kennedy clerk working on the case to get the words “trousers” and “slacks” into the final opinion. “Trousers” made it into the U.S. Reports, but “slacks” is absent, although whether this is because the clerk failed to put it in his draft or because Justice Kennedy took it out we cannot be sure.
3. Obama is really horrible with filling judicial vacancies. (NY Times).
President Obama is set to end his term with dozens fewer lower-court appointments than both Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush achieved in their first four years, and probably with less of a lasting ideological imprint on the judiciary than many liberals had hoped for and conservatives had feared.
Mr. Obama’s record stems in part from a decision at the start of his
presidency to make judicial nominations a lower political priority,
according to documents and interviews with more than a dozen current and
former administration officials and with court watchers from across the
political spectrum. Senate Republicans also played a role, ratcheting
up partisan warfare over judges that has been escalating for the past
generation by delaying even uncontroversial picks who would have been
quickly approved in the past.
But a good portion of Mr. Obama’s judicial record stems from a deliberate strategy. While Mr. Bush quickly nominated a slate of appeals court judges
early in his first year — including several outspoken conservatives —
Mr. Obama moved more slowly and sought relatively moderate jurists who
he hoped would not provoke culture wars that distracted attention from
his ambitious legislative agenda.
“The White House in that first year did not want to nominate candidates
who would generate rancorous disputes over social issues that would
further polarize the Senate,” said Gregory B. Craig, Mr. Obama’s first
White House counsel. “We were looking for mainstream, noncontroversial
candidates to nominate.”
4. CBP is protecting us from fake Christian Louboutin high heels. (Article and picture by CNN).