Get well

Apparently Magistrate Judge Theodore Klein is seriously ill. We wish him the very best and hope for a speedy recovery.

Padilla reviewing documents at courthouse

So says this AP article.

Justice Kennedy Speaks Out Against Lengthy Sentences

Once again Justice Kennedy has spoken - federal sentences are too harsh. Period. His latest comments came from a speech at the Ninth Circuit Conference this week.

"If an 18-year-old is growing marijuana for a friend, that's distribution," the Sacramento native told judges, lawyers and court officials at the conference, held at the Hyatt Regency. "If he has his father's .22 rifle, that's a firearm. That will get 15 years. "Did you know what 15 years was when you were 18? I didn't when I was 18."

Justice Kennedy also spoke out against the lobbying efforts of correctional officers' unions adding: "The fact that the prison guards' association lobbies for higher penalties is sick," Justice Kennedy said.

I guess the question is what can be done? It appears, at least thus far, that Justice Kennedy's bark is louder than his bite? He has yet to author an opinion with the same rhetoric of his recent speeches. Whatever one's beliefs are regarding the length of federal sentences, it appears that this debate is far from over.

Cocaine Cowboy movie

Readers of this blog might be interested in Alfred Spellman's and Billy Corben's new documentary, Cocaine Cowboys. Check out the profile in the July issue of Ocean Drive and their
blog.

News and notes

Lots of good stuff in the Review today:

1. Padilla news (subscription required) from Julie Kay: "Defense attorneys involved in the scheduled trial of Jose Padilla and four co-defendants accused of plotting and supporting terrorism are sparing no expense in preparing their defense, including traveling to the Middle East to interview potential witnesses. William Swor, the Detroit lawyer for Kifah Jayyousi, is currently in the Middle East, and Kenneth Swartz, the Miami lawyer who represents Adham Hassoun, is planning on traveling to Jordan and Egypt later this month, according to sources involved in the case. Swartz declined to comment, and Swor was unavailable. It’s unclear whether lawyers for key defendant Padilla also will be traveling to the Middle East. Calls to Andrew Patel of New York and Michael Caruso of the federal public defender’s office in Miami were not returned by deadline. Also last week, Padilla’s lawyers asked the government to initiate a request for “evidence and assistance” from Egypt. No further information about what information Padilla’s lawyers are trying to obtain was available in the court file. Padilla’s attorneys asked for the request to be sealed, so the prosecution team would not find out about it. U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke denied the request."

2. Former U.S. Attorney news (subscription required) by Carl Jones: Marcos Jiminez is stirring the pot -- "Former U.S. Attorney Marcos Jimenez has filed an unusual petition on behalf of the Miami-Dade Judicial Nominating Commission asking the Florida Supreme Court to override the Legislature and allow the governor to appoint 55 new judges. When the Legislature created the new positions in May it specifically required the judges be elected. Jimenez and the 11th Judicial Circuit JNC — whose nine members were all appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush — asks that the judgeships be filled by appointment by the end of this year. That would mean that Gov. Bush would get to appoint the new judges before he leaves office in early 2007. The surprise move seeks to reverse a delicate compromise reached last year between Republicans and Democrats. Last year, the Republican-controlled Legislature created 55 new judgeships to be filled through appointment by the Republican governor. The deal with the Democrats was that the judgeships created in 2006 would be filled through election. The seats created this year included 35 circuit court judgeships and 20 county court judgeships."

Interesting issue here. Any thoughts?

News and notes

Lots of good stuff in the Review today:

1. Padilla news (subscription required) from Julie Kay: "Defense attorneys involved in the scheduled trial of Jose Padilla and four co-defendants accused of plotting and supporting terrorism are sparing no expense in preparing their defense, including traveling to the Middle East to interview potential witnesses. William Swor, the Detroit lawyer for Kifah Jayyousi, is currently in the Middle East, and Kenneth Swartz, the Miami lawyer who represents Adham Hassoun, is planning on traveling to Jordan and Egypt later this month, according to sources involved in the case. Swartz declined to comment, and Swor was unavailable. It’s unclear whether lawyers for key defendant Padilla also will be traveling to the Middle East. Calls to Andrew Patel of New York and Michael Caruso of the federal public defender’s office in Miami were not returned by deadline. Also last week, Padilla’s lawyers asked the government to initiate a request for “evidence and assistance” from Egypt. No further information about what information Padilla’s lawyers are trying to obtain was available in the court file. Padilla’s attorneys asked for the request to be sealed, so the prosecution team would not find out about it. U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke denied the request."

2. Former U.S. Attorney news (subscription required) by Carl Jones: Marcos Jiminez is stirring the pot -- "Former U.S. Attorney Marcos Jimenez has filed an unusual petition on behalf of the Miami-Dade Judicial Nominating Commission asking the Florida Supreme Court to override the Legislature and allow the governor to appoint 55 new judges. When the Legislature created the new positions in May it specifically required the judges be elected. Jimenez and the 11th Judicial Circuit JNC — whose nine members were all appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush — asks that the judgeships be filled by appointment by the end of this year. That would mean that Gov. Bush would get to appoint the new judges before he leaves office in early 2007. The surprise move seeks to reverse a delicate compromise reached last year between Republicans and Democrats. Last year, the Republican-controlled Legislature created 55 new judgeships to be filled through appointment by the Republican governor. The deal with the Democrats was that the judgeships created in 2006 would be filled through election. The seats created this year included 35 circuit court judgeships and 20 county court judgeships."

Interesting issue here. Any thoughts?

No bond for old Mafia suspects

Here's the intro from the Sun-Sentinel article on the bond denial in the South Florida Genovese crime family:

A federal judge denied bond Friday to the alleged boss of the Genovese crime family's South Florida operations and three others awaiting trial on charges of extortion, robbery, and money laundering. He will consider bond for another man.U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry Seltzer denied bail for Renaldi ``Ray'' Ruggiero, 72, whom federal prosecutors identified as a Genovese capo or captain, and three of his co-defendants--Joseph Dennis Colasacco, 54, Charles Steinberg, 30, and Mitchell Weissman, 54, said Weissman's attorney John Contini.

Seltzer, prosecutors and attorneys for another defendant, Francis O'Donnell, 47, will continue negotiations for his release on Monday, said Theresa Van Vliet, one of his attorneys. O'Donnell is the head of Coach Industries Group, a financial services company.

Ken Lay is not a convicted criminal

Because he died before his direct appeal was final, Ken Lay's conviction is technically abated, which means that his entire criminal case is treated as though it never existed. (The conviction and sentence of a defendant is vacated when he dies if his appeal is yet to be decided. See Schreiber v. Sharpless, 110 U.S. 76,80 (1884)). My first case at the Federal Defender's office involved this issue, albiet in a different way.

UPDATE -- White Collar Crime Blog has more about the law in the Fifth Circuit:

In a recent Fifth Circuit decision, United States v. Estate of Parsons, 367 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2004), the court explained that "the appeal does not just disappear, and the case is not merely dismissed. Instead, everything associated with the case is extinguished, leaving the defendant as if he had never been indicted or convicted." In Parsons, the court vacated a forfeiture order, which means that the government's forfeiture claim against Lay for $43.5 million will be dismissed. The Fifth Circuit explained the rationale for the rule: "The finality principle reasons that the state should not label one as guilty until he has exhausted his opportunity to appeal. The punishment principle asserts that the state should not punish a dead person or his estate." An interesting question is whether one can still describe Lay as having been convicted of a crime, at least in a technical sense, because the law no longer recognizes there having been any criminal case initiated against him.