That's the title of a piece I co-wrote with my daughter Kate Markus for the Daily Business Review. It starts like this:
There’s been a lot of talk about
overcriminalization in recent years. Prosecutors are going after folks
for everything you can imagine. In one famous example, retired race car
driver Bobby Unser was prosecuted by the feds for driving his snowmobile
on protected federal land. Unser had gotten lost during a snowstorm and
was seeking shelter. Closer to home, members of a religious outreach
group were arrested and prosecuted for feeding the homeless in a Fort
Lauderdale park because they violated a food sharing law.
Because our trial system has turned almost
exclusively into a system of pleas (97% of cases resolve by way of plea
agreement), one might think that all of these prosecutions must be
justified. That could not be further from the truth. The system has made
the risks of trial so daunting—with a defendant likely to
receive a sentence many times longer if he has the audacity to declare
his innocence and proceed to trial—that most defendants fall on the sword and plead guilty, even if they are innocent.
The list of federal crimes has become so
lengthy that it is unknown how many there actually are. This is in stark
contrast to the federal criminal code in 1790, which included just 30
crimes. By the 1980s, that number was more than 3,000. Although the
Department of Justice (DOJ) has not catalogued all of the crimes on the
books now, there are over 300,000 statutes and regulations that carry
federal criminal penalties.