Acquitted conduct issue may be before the Supreme Court again

One issue that non-lawyers (as well as non-criminal lawyers) completely do not believe is that you can be sentenced based on conduct for which you have been acquitted.  That's been the law since 1997 in a case called Watts, which held that acquitted conduct, proved by a preponderance of the evidence, could be used to increase a defendant's sentence.  This concept is being challenged again in Ball v. United States.  From the Blog of the Legal Times:

 The issue comes to the court in a Washington drug case, Ball v. United States, along with significant help from a leading sentencing scholar, the libertarian Cato Institute and the Rutherford Institute. According to the court’s docket, the petition will be before the court for consideration—along with hundreds of others—at its September 29 conference.
After an eight-month trial in 2007, the jury found Antwaun Ball, Desmond Thurston and Joseph Jones guilty of selling between two and 11 grams of cocaine, relatively small amounts. But they were acquitted on racketeering and other charges that they were part of an extensive narcotics conspiracy.
Yet when Judge Richard Roberts sentenced the three men, he said he “saw clear evidence of a drug conspiracy,” and on that basis ultimately sentenced Ball, Thurston and Jones to 18, 16 and 15 years in prison, respectively—four times higher than the highest sentences given for others who sold similar amounts of cocaine, according to the petition in their case.
“Nobody in the federal system gets this kind of time,” said Stephen Leckar, of counsel to Kalbian Hagerty in Washington, who represents the defendants. “In this country, people are punished for charges that are proven to a jury’s satisfaction.”
Asserting that the sentencing judge “marginalized the role of the jury,” Leckar said the jury foreman in his case wrote a letter to the judge. The letter stated, “It seems to me a tragedy that one is asked to serve on a jury, serves, but then finds out their work may not be given the credit it deserves.”
On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the sentence even though it was based in part on acquitted conduct.
“Although we understand why appellants find sentencing based on acquitted conduct unfair,” the court said, “binding precedent of this court establishes that the practice does not violate the Sixth Amendment when the conduct is established by a preponderance of the evidence and the sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum for the crime.” The “preponderance of the evidence” standard for sentencing is easier to meet than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard jurors use to find guilt.

RIP Pat Davis

Pat Davis, who was married to our former chief judge Edward B. Davis for 52 years, passed away earlier this week.  She was a very private person and did not want a public service, but I thought it was important to post about her as she was such a special woman.  She loved Judge Davis so much and treated all of his law clerks like family.  She is survived by three children, Diana, Ned, and Traci; five grandchildren; and two great-grandchildren. The federal court family in the SDFLA is thinking of them.

Here are some pictures of her from the Federal Bar's Installation Dinner a few years back(credit Aidi Guerrero), which really capture her (so engaging and enthusiastic):

Interview list for Judge Rosenbaum's seat

Yesterday, I posted the link to the JNC's list of interviewees for Judge Rosenbaum's seat.  The Commission decided to interview 15 of the 24 people who applied.  Of those fifteen, 11 are state court judges.  There is a federal prosecutor and a federal magistrate.   Sadly, there are only two private lawyers.  

Each interview will last 25 minutes in the Judge's conference room in the Ferguson building.  Interviews are open to the public, so please let me know if you'd like to guest blog the interviews.  The JNC has invoked "the Rule" so applicants aren't permitted to watch other applicants.

Here is the list:

Martin J. Bidwell
Beatrice A. Butchko
Jeffrey J. Colbath
Mary Barzee Flores
David A. Haimes
Migna Sanchez-Llorens
Peter R. Lopez
Thomas Rebull
Meenu Sasser
Barry S. Seltzer
Edward N. Stamm
John W. Thornton, Jr.
Daryl E. Trawick
Jack Tuter
Melissa Damian Visconti

JNC announces interviews for district bench

Link here: http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/JNC-NOTICE0001.pdf

More to follow soon. 

Ana Alliegro pleads guilty on eve of trial

Curt Anderson, from the AP, covers it here:

Less than a week before trial, a onetime close associate of former U.S. Rep. David Rivera pleaded guilty Tuesday to four charges in a long-running campaign finance investigation that also implicates Rivera.
Attorneys for Ana Alliegro announced in a surprise that she would plead guilty rather than go to trial Monday. Prosecutor Thomas Mulvihill said there was no plea agreement requiring Alliegro to cooperate as a government witness against Rivera.
Her attorney, Richard Klugh, said there was no written deal in place.
"There is no guaranteed benefit for the plea. She's just accepted responsibility," he said.
Rivera, a Republican, has not been charged and has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Alliegro, 44, was accused of funneling about $80,000 to an unknown Democratic candidate, Justin Sternad, in the 2012 primary for the House seat then held by Rivera. Prosecutors say the goal was to weaken Democrat Joe Garcia, who won anyway and later defeated Rivera in the general election.
Mulvihill said Tuesday for the first time publicly that Rivera was part of the conspiracy when asked for the name by U.S. District Judge Robert Scola. In the past, Rivera was identified only as "co-conspirator A" in court documents.
Rivera did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Tuesday.
Earlier this year, Rivera filed papers to run for his old 26th District House seat again, then suspended his campaign in July. Recently, however, Rivera has been participating in campaign events such as a candidates forum over the weekend, and his name will appear on next Tuesday's GOP primary ballot.
Alliegro, meanwhile, is to be sentenced Sept. 10. The four charges against her each carry potential five-year prison sentences, but she is likely to get far less because she has now pleaded guilty and may cooperate in the ongoing investigation. Sternad also pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven months in prison.