That's Judge Williams doing the honors. The formal investiture will be announced sometime soon. Congratulations to well-deserving Michael Caruso.
The Apple/Samsung trial has Judge Koh. But we have Judge Turnoff, who had these gems yesterday (via Sun-Sentinel):
In September, the judge found the two men in contempt of court and
ordered them to repay every dime of the fees or explain why they
couldn't pay. The two ignored the order for months. Roy had to be
arrested in New York last month to answer to the judge.
Mayas had
claimed he sold the Miramar home but underwent a change of heart or mind
after the judge spelled out the consequences of continuing to test his
patience.
Then Mayas skipped a court hearing last week, in part he said, because he got sick after undergoing a colonoscopy. But the judge wasn't buying it .
"There's simply no excuse'' for his failure to show up in court last week, Turnoff told Mayas.
When
Coulton's lawyer, Paul Petruzzi, told the judge Mayas had not handed
over the keys to his vehicle and his Monarch Lakes home, the judge
demanded he turn over the keys in court.
As Mayas fumbled with his
briefcase and his keyring for what seemed an unnecessarily long time,
the judge cracked: "I bet the colonoscopy was easier than this."
With
the house keys in hand and a promise the car would be turned over
within hours, Petruzzi said it was a small step toward making things
right.
But he said Coulton wasn't particularly enjoying watching his two former lawyers put through the legal wringer.
"This
will barely make a dent in what they owe to my client," Petruzzi said.
"[Coulton] would be a lot happier if he could just go back in time and
have hired a proper lawyer from the start."
The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
Friday, August 17, 2012
Thursday, August 16, 2012
“First, your honor, I’m not smoking crack. I can promise you that.”
That was Apple lawyer William Lee in response to Judge Koh's comment that "unless you’re smoking crack you know these witnesses aren’t going to be called!” Yikes.
The dispute arises from the judge's decision to give each side a certain amount of hours to present its case. Of course, each side wants more now that it has run out.
From Slashgear:
Today in the ongoing Apple vs Samsung court case Judge Lucy Koh’s patience wore thin as Apple presented a 75-page document highlighting 22 witnesses it would like to call in for rebuttal testimony, provided the court had the time. As those following the case closely know quite well, the case has a set number of hours which are already wearing quite thin. As quoted by The Verge as they sat in the courtroom listening in, Koh wondered aloud why Apple would offer the list “when unless you’re smoking crack you know these witnesses aren’t going to be called!”
Ouch. For the record, Apple lawyer William Lee told Judge Koh that “First, your honor, I’m not smoking crack. I can promise you that.” Crack or no, it seems that Apple will not get the opportunity to bring all of these rebuttal witnesses to the stand, even though Apple’s attorneys offered to shorten the length of the document.
The dispute arises from the judge's decision to give each side a certain amount of hours to present its case. Of course, each side wants more now that it has run out.
From Slashgear:
Today in the ongoing Apple vs Samsung court case Judge Lucy Koh’s patience wore thin as Apple presented a 75-page document highlighting 22 witnesses it would like to call in for rebuttal testimony, provided the court had the time. As those following the case closely know quite well, the case has a set number of hours which are already wearing quite thin. As quoted by The Verge as they sat in the courtroom listening in, Koh wondered aloud why Apple would offer the list “when unless you’re smoking crack you know these witnesses aren’t going to be called!”
Ouch. For the record, Apple lawyer William Lee told Judge Koh that “First, your honor, I’m not smoking crack. I can promise you that.” Crack or no, it seems that Apple will not get the opportunity to bring all of these rebuttal witnesses to the stand, even though Apple’s attorneys offered to shorten the length of the document.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
11th Circuit kicks Mathurin case on other grounds
This was the case that Judge Cooke ruled a 300 year mandatory sentence for a juvenile was unconstitutional. Both sides appealed, and the Eleventh Circuit vacated the conviction on speedy trial grounds, and did not mention the sentencing issue.
The issue presented:
This case requires us to decide the narrow question of whether the time
during which plea negotiations are conducted is automatically excludable from the
Speedy Trial Act’s thirty-day window for filing an information or indictment. For
the reasons that follow, we have concluded that the time during which plea
negotiations are conducted is not automatically excludable.
From the conclusion:
We conclude that the time during which plea negotiations were conducted
was not automatically excludable from Mr. Mathurin’s speedy-indictment clock.
That being the case, the government exceeded the maximum thirty-day delay for
bringing the indictment. Under the Act, this means that the charges in the
superseding indictment, as originally set forth in the juvenile information and later
cited in the government’s motion to transfer, must be dismissed.7 See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3162(a)(1). Mr. Mathurin’s convictions must be vacated. However, “we leave it
to the District Court to determine in the first instance whether dismissal should be
with or without prejudice.” Zedner, 547 U.S. at 509, 126 S. Ct. at 1990.
The issue presented:
This case requires us to decide the narrow question of whether the time
during which plea negotiations are conducted is automatically excludable from the
Speedy Trial Act’s thirty-day window for filing an information or indictment. For
the reasons that follow, we have concluded that the time during which plea
negotiations are conducted is not automatically excludable.
From the conclusion:
We conclude that the time during which plea negotiations were conducted
was not automatically excludable from Mr. Mathurin’s speedy-indictment clock.
That being the case, the government exceeded the maximum thirty-day delay for
bringing the indictment. Under the Act, this means that the charges in the
superseding indictment, as originally set forth in the juvenile information and later
cited in the government’s motion to transfer, must be dismissed.7 See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3162(a)(1). Mr. Mathurin’s convictions must be vacated. However, “we leave it
to the District Court to determine in the first instance whether dismissal should be
with or without prejudice.” Zedner, 547 U.S. at 509, 126 S. Ct. at 1990.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
News & Notes
1. Judge Turnoff's daughter is the news for doing good. Wendy Atrokhov seems like a good egg!
2. Apple rests. The judge still isn't happy. One quote: “I want to see papers, I don’t trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom.” Yikes.
3. DOJ finally agrees to free innocent prisoners. Brad Heath of USA Today has the scoop:
The media have dubbed her the “Queen of the Pacific,” a rare woman
who allegedly reached the top of the male-dominated Colombian-Mexican
drug world with her feminine mystique.
She was featured in the famous drug ballad titled “The Queen of the Queens,” sung by a band called Los Tucanes de Tijuana. One line in the narcocorrido captured her essence: “The more beautiful the rose, the sharper the thorns.”
Her name: Sandra Avila Beltrán. The raven-haired 51-year-old — at least that’s what her arrest form says her age is — will appear in Miami federal court Tuesday for her arraignment and bond hearing. She was extradited last week from Mexico, where she had been arrested in 2007, on charges of conspiring to smuggle loads of cocaine into the United States more than a decade ago.
“She is very Cleopatra-ish, like the Queen of the Nile,” said Miami criminal defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, who represented two other defendants in the same case. “She was able to maneuver her way in a man’s world and use the fact that she was a woman to her advantage in more ways than one.”
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/08/13/2950459/mexican-queenpin-faces-drug-charges.html#storylink=cpy
2. Apple rests. The judge still isn't happy. One quote: “I want to see papers, I don’t trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom.” Yikes.
3. DOJ finally agrees to free innocent prisoners. Brad Heath of USA Today has the scoop:
The department confirmed Monday that it had
instructed its lawyers to abandon legal objections that could have
blocked — or at least delayed — the inmates from being set free. In a court filing ,
the department said it had "reconsidered its position," and that it
would drop its legal arguments "in the interests of justice."
The shift follows a USA TODAY investigation
in June that identified more than 60 people who were imprisoned for
something an appeals court later determined was not a federal crime. The
investigation found that the Justice Department had done almost nothing
to identify those prisoners — many of whom did not know they were
innocent — and had argued in court that the men were innocent but should
remain imprisoned anyway.
Neither
Justice Department lawyers nor defense attorneys would speculate
Monday how many innocent prisoners eventually might be released. Some
who were convicted of other crimes might receive shorter sentences;
others might be tried for different offenses.
Chris Brook, the legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina,
called the move "an encouraging first step," but said "much more has to
be done for these wrongly incarcerated individuals." He said the
department still had not offered to identify prisoners who were sent to
prison for something that turned out not to be a federal crime.
She was featured in the famous drug ballad titled “The Queen of the Queens,” sung by a band called Los Tucanes de Tijuana. One line in the narcocorrido captured her essence: “The more beautiful the rose, the sharper the thorns.”
Her name: Sandra Avila Beltrán. The raven-haired 51-year-old — at least that’s what her arrest form says her age is — will appear in Miami federal court Tuesday for her arraignment and bond hearing. She was extradited last week from Mexico, where she had been arrested in 2007, on charges of conspiring to smuggle loads of cocaine into the United States more than a decade ago.
“She is very Cleopatra-ish, like the Queen of the Nile,” said Miami criminal defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, who represented two other defendants in the same case. “She was able to maneuver her way in a man’s world and use the fact that she was a woman to her advantage in more ways than one.”
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/08/13/2950459/mexican-queenpin-faces-drug-charges.html#storylink=cpy
Monday, August 13, 2012
Michael Caruso officially named Federal Defender
Congrats my friend!
He takes over for Judge Kathleen Williams.
I couldn't think of anyone else who could fill Judge Williams' shoes.
He takes over for Judge Kathleen Williams.
I couldn't think of anyone else who could fill Judge Williams' shoes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)