It was a fun week in San Francisco (I can't believe I missed the Father CutiƩ drama)...
I see the blog was in good hands while I was away. Rick was great and we hope to have him back on a regular basis.
Just a couple of quick hits before we get going for the week:
-- The Liberty City 6 jury (the latest version of it) will continue deliberating this week. That case is truly jinxed... (In his post on last week's LC6 happenings, Rick missed Mike Tein -- who, of course, is the most quotable lawyer in the District -- from the Blum article: "What a shameful waste of our taxes at the worst possible time. Just think what $10 million could have done for our schoolchildren in Liberty City.")
-- The District now has a Wiki page. It's interesting to look at the historical makeup of the Court. (Some trivia pointed out on the page: "This federal district has the dubious distinction of having had more judges removed through impeachment than any other district, with a total of two, one-third of all federal district judges so removed.")
-- Justice O'Connor had this to say about judicial elections: "They're awful. I hate them." More here.
-- Rick posted on the FIU faculty vote for Dean, and FIU law professor Howard Wasserman has a lot to say about the vote and the coverage here. Howard criticizes the open proceedings and compares it to watching sausages being made. Gotta disagree with Howard here -- we wanna know how sausages are made. Open proceedings are a good thing. Better to have the press in there and reporting (even if the coverage in this case wasn't complete) than the alternative of having the doors closed.
-- Rumpole demonstrates why the Ben Kuehne case needs to be dismissed.
Is the Herald going to write about how these liberty city lawyers are on 10 minute standby all day, every day. How are they supposed to practice?
ReplyDeleteNot relevant, but... I took the entrance exam more than two weeks ago. At the time, they announced that we would hear from them by last Friday if we failed and receive a certificate in the mail four weeks after the exam date if we passed. Do they generally hold to their deadlines? No phone call yes, so can I pop the champagne?
ReplyDelete11:21: what entrance exam? Who is "they"?
ReplyDeleteNow that David is back, I that the regular posters (who were terrified by Ricardo's intellectual rantings) will return and begin anew.
ReplyDeleteSee, perfect example...bad Grammar, incomprehensible point...all the trappings of the old posters.
ReplyDelete12:28... The exam to be an attorney in the Southern District. They was whoever the guy with the beard was who proctored the exam. Must be from the Clerk's office. I have no idea.
ReplyDelete