Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Will Supremes grant cert for Cuban 5?

That's the question raised by Jay Weaver in today's Herald.
Less than 1% of cert petitions get granted, but Tom Goldstein signed on to this one and there are very interesting legal issues getting lots of pub. I'll go out on a limb and say cert will be granted in this case. (Prior coverage here)

What say you dear readers?
Will the Supreme Court grant cert in the Cuban 5 case?
Yes
No
pollcode.com free polls

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:21 AM

    There aren't interesting issues -- there is the revolving Clerk wheel at work...a freaking travesty of justice.

    So interesting that the Court ruled that a judge can't sit on a case if he/she received a bunch of money from one of the litigants. But....get yourself a former Clerk to one of the justices and you get yourself a golden ticket to the dance!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not sure I follow. Goldstein wasn't a supreme court clerk.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:11 PM

    The Court should not take this case (though it probably will because it has never squarely addressed such a scenario). At its core, however, Goldstein's argument is predicated on gross generalizations about Cuban-Americans. (full disclosure: I'm Cuban American). The generalization--that Cuban-Americans could never be objective enough to fairly sit as jurors in a spy case or similar case--cuts against the type of stereotypes we generally disfavor when crafting legal principles/rules. It's on par with saying that African-Americans from the inner city--as an entire group--are biased against the police and therefore should be stricken in police corruption cases. For example, Obama captured 35% of the Cuban-American vote. In short, Cuban-Americans are not, and never have been, a politically homogenous group. There are generational differences, class differences, racial differences etc. across the community that affect how individuals come out on the political spectrum. The fact that a vocal group of Cuban-Americans have traditionally captured the spotlight does not mean that they represent the entire community or that those in this vocal segnment are the type that would end up on a jury panel. That said, I would warn Goldstein to be careful what he wishes for--the Court is conservative and may not take too kindly to his argument given the underlying crimes that the defendants were charged with.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:17 PM

    James J. Benjamin Jr. (Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP) - served as a law clerk at the U.S. Supreme Court for Justices Lewis F. Powell Jr. and John Paul Stevens.

    Troy D. Cahill (Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP)- served as staff attorney in the Supreme Court of the United States, Office of the Clerk from 2002 to 2006

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:54 PM

    Do you read all of your fellow twitter updates? Or are you trying to attempt to break blogger Rumpoles’ one hundred followers?

    ReplyDelete