Sunday, May 10, 2009

Back from the West Coast

It was a fun week in San Francisco (I can't believe I missed the Father CutiƩ drama)...

I see the blog was in good hands while I was away. Rick was great and we hope to have him back on a regular basis.

Just a couple of quick hits before we get going for the week:

-- The Liberty City 6 jury (the latest version of it) will continue deliberating this week. That case is truly jinxed... (In his post on last week's LC6 happenings, Rick missed Mike Tein -- who, of course, is the most quotable lawyer in the District -- from the Blum article: "What a shameful waste of our taxes at the worst possible time. Just think what $10 million could have done for our schoolchildren in Liberty City.")

-- The District now has a Wiki page. It's interesting to look at the historical makeup of the Court. (Some trivia pointed out on the page: "This federal district has the dubious distinction of having had more judges removed through impeachment than any other district, with a total of two, one-third of all federal district judges so removed.")

-- Justice O'Connor had this to say about judicial elections: "They're awful. I hate them." More here.

-- Rick posted on the FIU faculty vote for Dean, and FIU law professor Howard Wasserman has a lot to say about the vote and the coverage here. Howard criticizes the open proceedings and compares it to watching sausages being made. Gotta disagree with Howard here -- we wanna know how sausages are made. Open proceedings are a good thing. Better to have the press in there and reporting (even if the coverage in this case wasn't complete) than the alternative of having the doors closed.

-- Rumpole demonstrates why the Ben Kuehne case needs to be dismissed.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:38 AM

    Is the Herald going to write about how these liberty city lawyers are on 10 minute standby all day, every day. How are they supposed to practice?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:21 AM

    Not relevant, but... I took the entrance exam more than two weeks ago. At the time, they announced that we would hear from them by last Friday if we failed and receive a certificate in the mail four weeks after the exam date if we passed. Do they generally hold to their deadlines? No phone call yes, so can I pop the champagne?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:28 PM

    11:21: what entrance exam? Who is "they"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:26 PM

    Now that David is back, I that the regular posters (who were terrified by Ricardo's intellectual rantings) will return and begin anew.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:27 PM

    See, perfect example...bad Grammar, incomprehensible point...all the trappings of the old posters.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:39 AM

    12:28... The exam to be an attorney in the Southern District. They was whoever the guy with the beard was who proctored the exam. Must be from the Clerk's office. I have no idea.

    ReplyDelete