That was Sentencing Commission Chair, Judge Carlton W. Reeves. From FD.org:
The bipartisan United States Sentencing Commission voted unanimously today to prohibit conduct for which a person was acquitted in federal court from being used in calculating a sentence range under the federal guidelines (USSC press release available here).
“Not guilty means not guilty,” said Commission Chair Judge Carlton W. Reeves.
The U.S. Supreme Court last year sidestepped the question of whether the practice was unconstitutional, with several justices saying they would wait for the Sentencing Commission to first decide whether to address the issue.
The Commission revised its policy statement on age, permitting judges to downward depart based on age if appropriate in light of today’s richer understanding of the science and data surrounding youthful individuals, including recognition that cognitive changes lasting into the mid-20s affect individual behavior, culpability and the age-crime curve.
The Commission also passed a range of additional reforms, including those that bring uniformity to sentencing for certain gun and financial crimes and provide a potential downward departure based on age.
The amendments passed by the Commission today are available here. If Congress does not act to disapprove the changes, they will go into effect on November 1, 2024.
on deck and then in the hole:
ReplyDelete1. using acquitted conduct on substantive charges to support a a RICO conspiracy charge with the same underlying conduct; and
2. permitting trials in a state/federal case where the defendant was found not guilty of the same conduct in a state/federal case
Exactly right. CCE’s too. And uncharged conduct is still just fine. They suck.
Delete