Big arrest in SDFLA

British Virgin Islands Premier Andrew Alturo Fahie and the Caribbean territory’s port director, Oleanvine Maynard, were arrested on drug trafficking and money laundering charges Thursday after they went to a Miami airport to check on a huge cash payment that was promised them by an undercover operative pretending to be a Mexican cartel member.

That's how the Miami Herald article starts its coverage of a big undercover operation that finally led to some big arrests.  It continues:

The U.S. undercover probe actually began last fall with a series of mysterious meetings between a confidential government informant posing as the Mexican drug smuggler and a group claiming to be Lebanese Hezbollah operatives with connections to the Caribbean territory’s leaders, according to a criminal complaint and affidavit filed in the case. With their help, the U.S. informant eventually met up with BVI’s premier, Fahie, the port director, Maynard, and her son, Kadeem Maynard, to lure them into providing protection for purported Colombian cocaine shipments through the British Virgin Islands to Miami, U.S. authorities say.

Happy Earth Day! (Belated)

By Michael Caruso

 Florida is blessed with abundant natural beauty. But, there are many threats and challenges to our environment. In our backyard, there has been decades-old litigation involving the Everglades. The United States initiated this litigation in 1988 to enjoin discharges of phosphorus-laden water into the area and restore the Park and the Refuge to hydrologic conditions that support a balance of native flora and fauna. The parties entered into a consent decree in 1992—a historic agreement. According to sources, a key point in the settlement talks came with then-Gov. Lawton Chiles showed up at a court hearing in 1991 and said: "We want to surrender. I want to find out who I can give my sword to." The parties, of course, continue to litigate the decree. In 2019, Judge Moreno rejected a motion—without prejudice—by the South Florida Water Management District to end the decree.

Other natural resources in our state are at risk. According to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, our state is home to more large (first- and second-magnitude) springs than any other state. Springs are the window into the health of our groundwater, which is the source of 90% of drinking water for Floridians. Some springs support entire ecosystems with unique plants and animals. They also flow into rivers dependent on the spring’s clean freshwater. Florida's springs face various complex threats, including decreasing spring flows and excessive nutrients. Spring flows decrease because of declining water levels in the groundwater aquifer that sustains them, and excessive nutrients, mainly nitrate, can lead to algal growth and habit degradation.

Recently, the New York Times published an article describing the "slow-motion environmental tragedy" impacting the springs. Jeb Bush, through legislation, created the Florida Spring Initiative in 2001 to research, monitor, educate and provide landowner assistance to reduce the flow of sewage and fertilizer into springs and address declining spring flows. But, as the article details, while restoration work has reversed some damage, nutrient pollution has continued to increase. The photographs that accompany the article alternate between the beautiful and the depressing.

As Floridians, we can remember the environmental improvements made over the decades and recognize we need to work harder if our children and grandchildren are to enjoy the natural beauty of our state.

Varsity Blues to finally be challenged in the court of appeals

 One of the problem with a system geared to pleading guilty is that prosecutors are emboldened to bring questionable legal and factual cases.  The Varsity Blues cases are a good example.  Numerous folks have criticized the legal theory underlying the prosecution -- that paying someone to get your kid into college is a federal offense.  But almost everyone pleaded guilty in that operation because the risks of trial were simply too great.  

Finally, we have a few defendants who will be challenging the case in the First Circuit.  From the NY Times:

Lawyers for a private equity investor and a former casino executive facing federal prison in the college admissions scandal known as Operation Varsity Blues filed appeals on Monday seeking to have their convictions overturned.

Both men were accused of making payments to have their children admitted to elite universities as athletic recruits, even though prosecutors charged that they lacked qualifications to play Division 1 sports.

The men, John B. Wilson and Gamal Abdelaziz, face the longest sentences yet imposed on parents in the admissions scandal, in which more than 50 parents and college coaches were prosecuted for conspiring with William Singer, a college admissions counselor, to arrange “side door” admissions, primarily by using slots on athletic teams.

Mr. Wilson and Mr. Abdelaziz make similar arguments in their appeals — that donations to universities in an effort to secure admissions are commonplace and do not constitute bribery.

Mr. Wilson, a former business executive, was convicted in October on bribery charges and sentenced to 15 months in prison. He was accused of agreeing to pay more than $1.5 million to have his three children admitted to the University of Southern California, Harvard and Stanford.

Lawyers for Mr. Wilson, 62, of Lynnfield, Mass., say in court papers that the key claim against him — that he paid $220,000 to bribe his son’s way into a spot on U.S.C.’s water polo team in 2014 — is legally flawed.

None of the money was intended to personally enrich anyone at the school, they wrote in court papers.

“Donating to a university is not bribing its employees; the school cannot be both the victim of the scheme and its beneficiary,” said the filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Boston by lawyers for Mr. Wilson, including Noel J. Francisco, the former U.S. solicitor general.

Of the total $220,000, Mr. Singer forwarded $100,000 as a donation to U.S.C.’s water polo team, for which Mr. Wilson received a thank-you note. Another $100,000 went to Mr. Singer’s nonprofit foundation, which Mr. Wilson thought would benefit U.S.C., according to the appeal.

 

Short list for Magistrate Judge interviews

The Magistrate Judge selection committee has recommended the following names for two open slots:

Augustin-Birch, Panayotta Diane

Brown, Bruce Ontareo

Katz, Randall D.

Marlow, Elena Margarita

Moon, Stefanie Camille

Sanchez, Eduardo Ignacio

St. Peter-Griffith, Ann Marie

Zaron, Erica Sunny Shultz
 

Congrats to all.  The judges will hold their interviews on May 11 and select two.

Your weekend moment of Zen...

 

Johnny Depp learns hearsay. ☠️🤣 pic.twitter.com/WLEzVX3aYf

— jessica gore 🇺🇦✊ (@HuffleBloom) April 21, 2022

Magistrate Judge committee to interview 15 people for 2 slots

 Here's your list of the interviews, which are happening now:

Arteaga-Gomez, Rossana

Aslan, Erin Elizabeth Victoria

Augustin-Birch, Panayotta Diane

Brown, Bruce Ontareo

Corlew, Reginald Roy

Ferrer, Aimee Allegra

Katz, Randall D.

Marlow, Elena Margarita

Massey, Jessica A.

Moon, Stefanie Camille

Sanchez, Eduardo Ignacio

St. Peter-Griffith, Ann Marie

Thakur, Michael Eric

Weiss, Aaron Stenzler

Zaron, Erica Sunny Shultz
 

Should a juror be allowed to sit in a death penalty case where he said: Non-white races were statistically more violent than the white race.

Apparently yes, in Texas. 

The Supreme Court denied cert yesterday, but Justice Sotomayor dissented (joined by Kagan and Breyer) and said:

Racial bias is “odious in all aspects,” but “especially pernicious in the administration of justice.” Buck v. Davis, 580 U. S. ___, ___ (2017) (slip op., at 22) (internal quotation marks omitted). When racial bias infects a jury in a capital case, it deprives a defendant of his right to an impartial tribunal in a life-or-death context, and it “‘poisons public confidence’ in the judicial process.” Ibid. The seating of a racially biased juror, therefore, can never be harmless. As with other forms of disqualifying bias, if even one racially biased juror is empaneled and the death penalty is imposed,“the State is disentitled to execute the sentence,” Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U. S. 719, 729 (1992).
In this case, petitioner Kristopher Love, a Black man,claims that one of the jurors in his capital trial was racially biased because the juror asserted during jury selection that “[n]on-white” races were statistically more violent than the white race. 29 Record 145. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals never considered Love’s claim on the merits. Instead, relying on an inapposite state-law rule, the court concluded that any error was harmless because Love had been provided with two extra peremptory strikes earlier in the jury selection proceeding, which he had used before the juror at issue was questioned. That decision was plainly erroneous. An already-expended peremptory strike is no cure for the seating of an allegedly biased juror. The state court thus deprived Love of any meaningful review of his federal constitutional claim. I would summarily vacate the judgment below and remand for proper consideration.

RIP Ben Benjamin

 There's very little that I think of as positive about the FDC-Miami, but one bright spot was Officer Benjamin.  He was always professional and nice.  And he was a really cool dude.  He treated us defense lawyers and our clients with respect and as human beings.

Such sad news that he recently passed away.  

The obit:

“Ben” Benjamin Jr., 56, of Tamarac, FL transitioned to heaven unexpectedly on Wednesday, April 13, 2022. He was born on Tuesday, February 22, 1966 to Buell Sr. and Cassandra. He was employed by The United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons for over 23 years. He loved shooting, cooking, dancing and was known to many as a “Gentle Giant”. He enjoyed traveling to Colombia, spending time with his friends and family, and was an avid New York Yankee fanatic.

He is preceded in passing by his mother, father, and his brother; Andreas. He is survived by his loving wife; Maria del Pilar, brother; Clint, two sisters, his beloved aunt; Vergie Schou and numerous nieces and nephews.

A “Life Retirement Party” will be held on Thursday, April 21, 2022 with a closed casket from 6pm to 8pm. A “Life Retirement Service” will be officiated by Pastor Bernard King at 8pm. The family has requested that guests wear their favorite baseball attire, if they so choose.

Lastly, for those who are unable to attend the Life Retirement Service, please click the “watch video” button located below under Funeral Service at 8pm EST

In lieu of flowers, the family is requesting memorial gifts here.

DOJ's Antitrust division behaving amateurish (UPDATED)

It hasn't been a good couple of weeks for the DOJ's Antitrust Division. 

In Denver, they tried a 10 defendant case twice and both times it hung as to all defendants. Ouch!

Wearing those horse eye-blinders, DOJ announced it would retry the case a third time.  That didn't sit well with the judge, who summoned the head of the Division, Jonathan Kanter, to court to explain how a third trial would be in accordance with DOJ federal prosecution standards.  Bloomberg covered it here:

At the hearing Thursday, the judge repeatedly asked Kanter why he thinks the result of a third trial will be different. He also quizzed Kanter about a Justice Department policy requiring prosecutors to go forward with cases only if they believe the evidence will “probably” result in a conviction. But Brimmer said he doesn’t have the authority to require prosecutors to follow the standard.

The judge concluded the hearing by urging Kanter to “go back to Washington and think about that.”

Well then.  

In addition to those standards, there are, of course, basic standards of fairness and decency.  If you can't convict any of 10 defendants after a length trial, let alone two of them, it's time to call it quits.  Congress needs to fix this.  The government should get one shot to convict.  Then it's tie to move on to the next one.

But that's not the only Antitrust black eye.  It brought its first wage-fixing case in Texas against two defendants. Between the two of them, they were charged in 6 counts. The Division lost 5 of those counts, including the top counts.  It only got a conviction on a lesser false statement count against one of the defendants.  

So what does DOJ do?  It issued a press release with the heading: "Former Health Care Staffing Executive Convicted of Obstructing FTC Investigation into Wage-Fixing Allegations."  Are you kidding me?  The release starts this way:

Today, a Texas man was convicted of obstructing a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation, following an eight-day trial in the Eastern District of Texas.

“Lying to federal agencies is a crime, plain and simple,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “And, as the court’s rulings in this case make clear, so is wage fixing. When obstruction affects the federal government’s investigations into labor market collusion and impedes our ability to protect workers, we will use all the tools available to prosecute all of these crimes to the full extent of the law.”

“Wage fixing causes tremendous harm to countless hardworking Americans,” said Assistant Director Luis Quesada of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. “The FBI will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners to uncover this type of corruption and bring to justice anyone who is responsible or who obstructs our investigations into this conduct.”

How embarrassing.  But it's also wrong. These guys were exonerated.  And it's not until the 6th paragraph of the release that you see what actually happened at the trial.  Thank goodness there was some honest reporting about it, including from Bloomberg, which had this headline: "DOJ’s First Criminal Wage-Fixing Case Ends Mostly in Defeat."  

Antitrust is now waiting for a verdict in the first "no-poach" criminal trial.  Let's see what happens there and how Antitrust handles it.  In the meantime, they should be rethinking their new "aggressive" tactics in criminal cases.

UPDATED Friday evening 7:40 -- The jury acquitted both defendants in the first no-poach trial -- Kent Thiry and DeVita.  It's going to be hard for the government to spin this one!

Should a lake be able to sue?

That's the question raised in this New Yorker article about a lake in Florida, which is suing to protect itself.

From the intro:

Lake Mary Jane is shallow—twelve feet deep at most—but she’s well connected. She makes her home in central Florida, in an area that was once given over to wetlands. To the north, she is linked to a marsh, and to the west a canal ties her to Lake Hart. To the south, through more canals, Mary Jane feeds into a chain of lakes that run into Lake Kissimmee, which feeds into Lake Okeechobee. Were Lake Okeechobee not encircled by dikes, the water that flows through Mary Jane would keep pouring south until it glided across the Everglades and out to sea.

Mary Jane has an irregular shape that, on a map, looks a bit like a woman’s head in profile. Where the back of the woman’s head would be, there’s a park fitted out with a playground and picnic tables. Where the face would be, there are scattered houses, with long docks that teeter over the water. People who live along Mary Jane like to go boating and swimming and watch the wildlife. Toward the park side of the lake sits an islet, known as Bird Island, that’s favored by nesting egrets and wood storks.

Like most of the rest of central Florida, Mary Jane is under pressure from development. Orange County, which encompasses the lake, the city of Orlando, and much of Disney World, is one of the fastest-growing counties in Florida, and Florida is one of the fastest-growing states in the nation. A development planned for a site just north of Mary Jane would convert nineteen hundred acres of wetlands, pine flatlands, and cypress forest into homes, lawns, and office buildings.

In an effort to protect herself, Mary Jane is suing. The lake has filed a case in Florida state court, together with Lake Hart, the Crosby Island Marsh, and two boggy streams. According to legal papers submitted in February, the development would “adversely impact the lakes and marsh who are parties to this action,” causing injuries that are “concrete, distinct, and palpable.”

A number of animals have preceded Mary Jane to court, including Happy, an elephant who lives at the Bronx Zoo, and Justice, an Appaloosa cross whose owner, in Oregon, neglected him. There have also been several cases brought by entire species; for instance, the palila, a critically endangered bird, successfully sued Hawaii’s Department of Land and Natural Resources for allowing feral goats to graze on its last remaining bit of habitat. (The palila “wings its way into federal court in its own right,” Diarmuid O’Scannlain, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, wrote in a decision that granted the species relief.)

Still, Mary Jane’s case is a first. Never before has an inanimate slice of nature tried to defend its rights in an American courtroom. Depending on your perspective, the lake’s case is either borderline delusional or way overdue.

“It is long past time to recognize that we are dependent on nature, and the continued destruction of nature needs to stop,” Mari Margil, the executive director of the Center for Democratic and Environmental Rights, said in a statement celebrating the lawsuit.

“Your local lake or river could sue you?” the Florida Chamber of Commerce said. “Not on our watch.”

What A Difference It Makes

By Michael Caruso

When Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson takes the oath as the 116th justice on the Supreme Court, not only will she make history as the first Black woman to serve on the Court, but for the first time in 232 years, the Court will not have a majority of white men.

Notwithstanding, the Washington Post recently highlighted the few notable instances of racial and gender diversity on the Supreme Court that have made tangible changes to American life.  

Here's the list for those who are behind the paywall:

Furman v. Georgia—death penalty

United States v. Virginia—gender discrimination 

Virginia v. Black—cross burning 

Ledbetter v. Goodyear—pay discrimination 

Safford Unified School District v. Redding—strip search

Fisher v. University of Texas—affirmative action 

Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans—Confederate flags

Utah v. Strieff—right to search

We'll see what the future holds. 

I'd also like to use this space to congratulate two friends on receiving awards last week from Riverside House. Unfortunately, I couldn't attend because I was held captive in a windowless conference room in our nation's capital.  

Randy Hummel, an AUSA at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, was presented with the Janet Reno Award, and our very own David O. Markus was recognized with the Albert Krieger Award.  I couldn't think of two more deserving recipients of these prestigious awards. Well done.

How would a Republican Senate affect Biden's judicial picks?

 Would they all get blocked?  What would happen to a Supreme Court nominee? After the KBJ hearings, it is going to be interesting to see how it all plays out, especially if the Republicans take the Senate in November.  

The Supreme Court is now a pretty young court:

Thomas -- 73

Alito -- 72

Roberts -- 67

Sotomayor -- 67

Kagan -- 61

Kavanaugh -- 57

Gorusch -- 54

Jackson -- 51

Barrett -- 50

Meantime, we are still waiting on a U.S. Attorney and judges here in SDFLA... what's going on there?!

YES!

 

A new way to get out of jury service.

 Ahhh, you gotta love South Florida.  A juror in the Nikolas Cruz case was let go because she was too busy with her sugar daddy.  I kid you not.  From the New York Post:

A prospective juror for the sentencing of Florida school shooter Nikolas Cruz told the judge she wouldn’t have time for the civic duty — because she’s both married and has a “sugar daddy.”

Parkland gunman Nikolas Cruz pleaded guilty in October to 17 counts of first-degree murder and 17 counts of attempted murder in connection with the massacre.

***During the proceeding, Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer asked whether she had missed anyone with concerns or questions, courtroom video shows.

“Did you have a question?” she asks one of the prospective jurors, whom she identified as “Miss Bristol.”

“This is a whole entire month,” the woman replies. “First of all let me clarify myself, July 2nd is my birthday, July 4th is my son, and the 18th is my other son.”

Scherer tells her to slow down.

“Don’t talk too fast, we have to be able to understand … so you said that the July, there’s dates in July that you’re not available? What are those dates?” the judge asks.

“July 7th, July 4th, and July 18th … And again, I need to figure out something. I have my sugar daddy that I see every day,” Bristol answers.

“I’m sorry?” Scherer asks in a deadpan manner as she cocks her head.

“My sugar daddy,” Bristol repeats.

“OK, I’m not exactly sure what you’re talking about but we’ll …,” the judge interjects.

“I’m married, and I have my sugar daddy. I see him every day,” Bristol says.

“OK. All right. Ma’am, we’ll come back to you, OK? Thank you,” Scherer responds.

More than 120 of the first 160 prospective jurors were dismissed — including Bristol, Fox News reported.

 

CODA and SDFL

 

By John R. Byrne

The film CODA—an acronym for Child of Deaf Adults—recently won the Oscar for Best Picture.  Troy Kotsur, the deaf actor who played the deaf father of the main character, also took home an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.  It’s an incredible movie.  Its success has brought more media attention to a recent order issued by Judge Ruiz.  The Florida Bar Journal covered it yesterday.  The case involved a deaf woman who said she struggled to get proper help at the Cleveland Clinic in Weston.  The parties settled the case but Judge Ruiz found that the hospital failed to honor its agreement to train staff on how to properly interact with the deaf.  He ultimately ordered the hospital to pay the $16,000 fine to the Center for Independent Living of Broward County, an entity that provides deaf interpreters for certain events. 

Troy Kotsur’s Oscar acceptance speech is worth a watch.  May want to have a box of tissues handy….

"Public defenders often have a natural inclination in the direction of the criminal."

That's Senator Ted Cruz ... I was going to write unbelievable, but I guess it's not.

 

Ted Cruz goes on a bizarre, lie-filled rant against public defenders:

"Public defenders often have a natural inclination in the direction of the criminal."

Reminder: every American is constitutionally guaranteed legal representation. pic.twitter.com/wg0hvwwydV

— American Bridge 21st Century (@American_Bridge) April 4, 2022

Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian sworn in (UPDATED WITH NOTE FROM WILLIAM ROMANISHIN)

 As fellow blogger John Byrne reported last week, our newest magistrate judge was sworn in on Friday.  Here's a picture, courtesy of Daniel Portnoy Photography:

 Congratulations to Judge Damian!

Update -- I loved this comment from longtime court reporter Bill Romanishin:

"Melissa" was one of many excellent law clerks I had the privilege of meeting and working with during my 28-year stint as Judge Ungaro's court reporter. I had intended to attend her investiture but was unable to. So I'm sharing a poem I wrote in Her Honor.

TRIBUTE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAMIAN

My Dear Magistrate Judge "Melissa"
I have to say we sure did miss ya
When you left our chambers so long ago
After two years of clerking with Judge Ungaro

On you went to bigger and better things
The practice of law and all that that brings
Working diligently to file that legitimate motion
With confidence, intelligence, and great devotion

To the client who chose you for legal representation
To win their lawsuit and put an end to the litigation
Knowing you gave it your best with vigor and vim
Your reward being a judge's order that says you win

But who can forget your brownies that were so delish
And that secret recipe that you surely did relish
Myself perhaps the greatest fan of that sweet treat
Some might think that all we did in chambers is eat

But they will surely now soon discover
Their R&R has your name on the cover
Its content reflecting your expertise and precision
A judge seeing your name with deference to your decision

Knowing you rendered it with analysis and great thought
After listening to both sides in the courtroom where they fought
You exude great knowledge, forethought, and nothing less
So in this new position I know you'll give it your best!

Congratulations to Judge Melissa Damian

By John R. Byrne

Beautiful ceremony this Friday afternoon celebrating Judge Damian’s investiture.  Judge Ungaro gave a heartfelt speech about her former law clerk followed by funny and poignant speeches from Melanie Damian and the judge herself.  

Blogger David Markus was in absentia but received a shout out!