The Supreme Court affirmed the 11th Circuit in an odd 5-4 lineup in which Chief Justice Roberts (along withe Kagan and Ginsburg) joined Justice Sotomayor in dissent. Justice Thomas held for the majority: The Armed Career Criminal Act’s elements clause encompasses a robbery
offense that, like Florida’s law, requires the criminal to overcome the
victim’s resistance.
It used to be mildly surprising when Justice Breyer voted against criminal defendants, but that is the norm now. He is among the worst justices on criminal justice issues. In this case, one friend put it this way: Breyer literally snatched victory from Stokeling's hands, violently.
This case is a pretty good example of how Scalia's death really affected the Court on criminal justice issues. Scalia wrote the Johnson decision on which Stokeling's argument was based. He likely would have sided with the defense here, where his replacement sided with the government.
Newsflash...robbery, whether by sudden snatching or punching or gun is violent. I understand the statutory language issues, etc., but really, guy who snatches your phone is going to fight you or worse if you resist. That is violent .
ReplyDeleteRegardless of the result, kudos to Brenda Bryn for her excellent work on this case. The briefing and OA were top notch. She made everyone at the FPD proud.
ReplyDelete4:40 - Update - Four Supreme Court justices disagree with your brilliant and well-reasoned legal analysis.
ReplyDeleteCome back when it is five.
ReplyDeleteWhat a jerk.
ReplyDeleteWhich one?
ReplyDeleteBreyer switched sides from his Johnson vote. Splits happen!
The jerk who said "come back when it's 5." I believe his initials are D.B.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I can tell, Breyer changed his stance on criminal defendants around the time he was personally robbed: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-burglary/supreme-court-justice-breyer-robbed-again-idUSBRE84G1CB20120517
ReplyDelete