1. Nice win for Marc Seitles and Ed Kacerosky, which is covered by John Pacenti in the DBR:
For Seitles, it was the equivalent of going all in during a poker
round. He waived attorney-client privilege and laid out what he had for
prosecutors. Seitles decided to take "a different road with this case"
for the man who was Colombia's air security secretary from 2002 to 2005.
"I never worked harder on something in all my life," he added.
The
U.S. attorney's office had no comment on the charge being dropped. The
document dismissing the charge Friday supplied no explanation.
Both
Seitles and Kacerosky started working pro bono, knowing Ortega's family
could no longer afford the long hours it took to root out the truth.
Even though the government said it had a cooperating witness, Kacerosky
found a co-defendant who told him authorities had arrested the wrong
Carlos.
They went through hundreds of hours of phone calls. They
found Colombian authorities mixed up not only two airplane brokers named
Carlos, but a third who was nicknamed Carlos.
Ortega's family was in tears when they picked him up outside jail.
2. The lawyer under the microscope of Judge Turnoff took 5 more than 80 times. Via The Sun-Sentinel:
Disbarred lawyer Emmanuel Roy got a chance Tuesday to explain himself
in a South Florida case where a federal judge found Roy behaved so
outrageously that he should return $275,000 in exorbitant fees to a
former client.
Instead of explaining, Roy invoked his Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination — more than 80 times in less
than an hour — when called to testify in federal court in Miami Tuesday
by the lawyer who is now representing Roy's former client.
"I'm exercising my Fifth Amendment right," Roy said in response to questions from lawyer Paul Petruzzi.
The answer was the same
regardless of the question — does Roy have any bank accounts, has he
hidden assets in other people's names, does he currently live with his
wife, could he identify himself in a photograph? It got so repetitive
that Roy, who is also facing mortgage fraud charges in New York,
abbreviated his answer to "Exercising my Fifth Amendment right" over and
over again.
3. Jay Weaver covers Judge Moore's decision concerning in-state tuition prices for students who live in Florida but have non-resident parents:
A federal judge in Miami has ruled the state is discriminating against
potentially thousands of U.S. citizens who live in Florida, by charging
them higher out-of-state tuition as nonresident students simply because
their parents may lack legal U.S. residency.
U.S. District
Judge K. Michael Moore found Tuesday that Florida's rule classifying
such students according to their parents' undocumented immigration
status violates the Constitution's equal protection provision.
"By virtue of their classification, (these Florida students) are
denied a benefit in the form of significantly lower tuition rates to the
state's public post-secondary educational institutions," the judge
found in a 19-page opinion that was highly critical of the state's
policy.
"This creates an additional obstacle for (them) to
attain post-secondary education from one of the state's public
institutions that is not faced by other residents."
Moore,
who was nominated by President George H.W. Bush and confirmed in 1992,
further found the policy "does not advance any legitimate state
interest, much less the state's important interest in furthering
educational opportunities for its own residents."
You need a headline writer. "News and notes" and happenings just doesn't cut it in this competitive web/blogging environment. For instance, today should have been " A Fifth of Roy" or "Roy tells Turnoff 'that's for me to know and you find out"
ReplyDeleteWhat a great result for Seitles and Kacerosky. Kudos to prosecutors as well. There have been some who would have taken it to trial anyway just to see it Rule 29'd.
ReplyDeleteMad Props to KMM for doing the right thing
ReplyDelete