It's almost impossible for a criminal defendant to win in the 11th Circuit. But the pro se prisoner who filed the above pleading in the court of appeals did just that. From the opinion's intro:
Luis Camejo-Rodriguez seeks relief from his 1995 guilty plea to various cocaine and firearm offenses. In the instant appeal, he argues that the document he filed on September 11, 2009, entitled “Notice of Appeal Rule 4(a) of Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Request Permission to Appeal My 17 Years of Wrongful Conviction,” is an application to this Court for an order authorizing him to file a second or successive habeas petition. We conclude that Camejo-Rodriguez does not need such an order because the district court failed to properly notify him of the consequences of re-characterizing an earlier motion as his first § 2255 habeas petition, as required by Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 383, 124 S. Ct. 786,
792 (2003). Therefore, Camejo-Rodriguez is entitled to file a habeas petition that is not subject to the restrictions placed on second or successive petitions.
UPDATE--Congrats to AFPD Janice Bergman who was appointed by the 11th to represent Mr. Camejo-Rodriguez.
My understanding is that Mr. Camejo-Rodriguez was represented by the FPD.
ReplyDeleteNot to take anything away from Mr. Camejo-Rodriguez, but Janice Bergman at the FPD's Office actually did the appeal that led to this victory.
ReplyDeleteCamejo-Rodriguez did everything in his power to have Janice fired from the case. Perhaps he is grateful that he lost that battle.
ReplyDeleteHaving seen 100's of appeals in the 11th Cir, end up as Pyrrhic victory (at best), unfortunately, his chances are better winning the lottery.
ReplyDelete