The
Rekers scandal has
reached the New York Times. The article raises the question of whether the lawyers who relied on
Rekers' testimony as an expert witness have an ethical obligation to inform the court of what happened.
Okay, we are in a poll taking mood. Here's two more while we are at it:
And we'd like to see what you think about
Rumpole's discussion of Graham:
In your poll regarding changes at the USAO, don't answers B and C mean the same thing?
ReplyDeleteA - many significant changes
ReplyDeleteB - although changes will be few, the changes will be significant.
C - there will be change, but the change will be cosmetic.