The SDFLA Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal practice in the Southern District of Florida. The New Times calls the blog "the definitive source on South Florida's federal court system." All tips on court happenings are welcome and will remain anonymous. Please email David Markus at dmarkus@markuslaw.com
shouldn't the question read
ReplyDelete"who should be chosen as our next federal judge"?
also- there is a qualitative difference between asking who "should" be chosen and who "will" be chosen.
It's clear I "should" be chosen for either or both. But I won't.
I think everyone understands the question Rumpy. And yes, I asked "should" as opposed to "will" because I want to know who people think is the best candidate, not who the senators will pick. We will get that poll up next.
ReplyDeletepicky picky picky
ReplyDeleteThat's right, Rump. And when you write "But I won't", do you mean that you won't accept the position if offered or that you won't be chosen? Remember, only I am the language master. See my comment to the second post from July 15 under the heading "JNC interviews & Guest Blogging" at 12:10 P.M. Once again, Strunk and White who?
ReplyDeleteSomeone needs to tell the language master that punctuation marks go inside of quotation marks when they immediately follow a quote. This is true even when the punctuation was not part of the original quote.
ReplyDeleteWhy are some comments not published. This blog sucks.
ReplyDeleteWhy are some comments not published? This blog rules!
ReplyDeleteI once successfully represented Strunk and White in County Court for splitting an infinitive without a license.
This is true even when the punctuation was not part of the original quote.
ReplyDelete___________________
Julie
Lock in your price today for Your favorite
channels - and keep it there until 2010!
I said I was the language master, not the punctuation master.
ReplyDelete