tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post3871401414419177749..comments2024-03-18T16:53:45.062-04:00Comments on Southern District of Florida Blog: Padilla and WilkDavid Oscar Markushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18386723948607633980noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-46185632938626246852007-05-14T15:39:00.000-04:002007-05-14T15:39:00.000-04:00Removed!Removed!David Oscar Markushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18386723948607633980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-5433829397560966262007-05-14T15:04:00.000-04:002007-05-14T15:04:00.000-04:00Mr. Markus,I know you exercise control over the co...Mr. Markus,<BR/>I know you exercise control over the content of this blog. I think it most irresponsible of you to allow the kind of libelous and vile commentary found at the 10:54 a.m. posting. The unfair diatribe launched at Judge Cohn found there is not only scurrilous and unfounded, it has no place in the blog of "an even handed statesman like" type as yourself. For shame!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-61569787433524084412007-05-11T23:51:00.000-04:002007-05-11T23:51:00.000-04:00hey 535 what are you talking about. this makes per...hey 535 what are you talking about. this makes perfect sense. why should we wait till the guy files a 2255 in which he claims he wanted to testify. it is actually prudent for a judge to do this to make sure the lawyer hasnt coerced the defendant into not testifying. why shouldnt the judge protect the record and make sure we dont have to waste the courts time on a 2255 evidentiary hearing when it can be avoided by a 3 minute colloquy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-19093589515112279682007-05-10T20:05:00.000-04:002007-05-10T20:05:00.000-04:00" Rising star Dore Louis", David just hire him alr..." Rising star Dore Louis", David just hire him already.......Please, he is a former SAO.......Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-53243712469842772262007-05-09T17:35:00.000-04:002007-05-09T17:35:00.000-04:00The right to remain silent colloquy? Isn't Wilk r...The right to remain silent colloquy? Isn't Wilk represented by two distinguished lawyers? You must mean the 2255 colloquy. The only reason for the Court to inquire at this stage is to obtain an admission against Wilk that can be used against him at a 2255. Absolutely inappropriate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-13816550636860597852007-05-09T17:26:00.000-04:002007-05-09T17:26:00.000-04:00How did he inject himself? I am sure it was part...How did he inject himself? I am sure it was part of the right to remain silent colloquy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-32435314288010791632007-05-09T13:45:00.000-04:002007-05-09T13:45:00.000-04:00David,Do you believe Judge Cohn acted properly in ...David,<BR/><BR/>Do you believe Judge Cohn acted properly in injecting himself into Wilk's decision to testify?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com