tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post934391580210526792..comments2024-03-28T14:19:33.056-04:00Comments on Southern District of Florida Blog: Can you get a fair trial in an identity theft case if one of the jurors is paranoid and thinks you are "al Qaeda" and needs to be in the "jury protection program"?David Oscar Markushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18386723948607633980noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-19650223936199566942016-03-23T12:36:07.976-04:002016-03-23T12:36:07.976-04:00CERT!CERT!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-40659886603523832512016-03-23T11:09:30.328-04:002016-03-23T11:09:30.328-04:00Well said, Send it up.
RBGWell said, Send it up. <br /><br />RBGThe Notorious RBGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-10422004701190549172016-03-23T07:17:46.283-04:002016-03-23T07:17:46.283-04:00What's the problem? The standard has always be...What's the problem? The standard has always been "fair, impartial, but no problem if scared and paranoid, so long as the court allays their fears a bit in a ten second exchange."<br /><br />ARE YOU KIDDING ME? <br /><br />Do they ever say to themselves "would I want this juror on my case? Or my child's case?" <br />No. That's not the standard of review. Nor, apparently is being able to sleep at night after their decision. <br /><br />I may be channeling my inner Scalia, but when I read the constitution I don't see "fair, impartial, fearful, paranoid juror." <br /><br />There's a reason why our profession has a high rate of alcohol abuse. <br /><br />Rumpolehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08380575650255695462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-37636365957450649812016-03-22T09:18:42.388-04:002016-03-22T09:18:42.388-04:00Seems legit. Seems legit. Not JAFI much longernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-69005360130720494712016-03-22T07:14:03.789-04:002016-03-22T07:14:03.789-04:00This is from the same court that wants to charge l...This is from the same court that wants to charge lawyers $100 to hear about the new civil rules.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com