tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post8719547433244878422..comments2024-03-18T16:53:45.062-04:00Comments on Southern District of Florida Blog: If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I ever joined an opinion for the Court that began: “The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity,” I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.David Oscar Markushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18386723948607633980noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-78083741973091054472015-06-30T15:48:28.161-04:002015-06-30T15:48:28.161-04:00Scalia is a pig, but he is a smart pig. Scalia is a pig, but he is a smart pig. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-24444798163254505042015-06-30T09:46:18.638-04:002015-06-30T09:46:18.638-04:00Why is Scalia considered smart by anyone? Agreed w...Why is Scalia considered smart by anyone? Agreed with 9:21 "...he is a complete idiot. Unable to win, he resorts to insults and name calling..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-21084710826823359402015-06-29T22:26:15.953-04:002015-06-29T22:26:15.953-04:00So would Thomas. So would Thomas. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-67377291292444516322015-06-29T16:29:42.345-04:002015-06-29T16:29:42.345-04:00Scalia would have dissented in Loving v. Virginia ...Scalia would have dissented in Loving v. Virginia <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-8563815553549947412015-06-29T09:21:17.411-04:002015-06-29T09:21:17.411-04:00He is a fool. Yes, he is one of the smarter fools...He is a fool. Yes, he is one of the smarter fools around, but he is a complete idiot. Unable to win, he resorts to insults and name calling; in doing that, he provides fodder to those who would legitimize the Court. By his reasoning, separate would still be equal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com