tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post4671944891204710555..comments2024-03-27T14:54:46.050-04:00Comments on Southern District of Florida Blog: Judge Altonaga orders new trial for e-discovery violationsDavid Oscar Markushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18386723948607633980noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-45113119326045065392012-06-06T23:01:52.284-04:002012-06-06T23:01:52.284-04:00He should recuse so it can go to Moore, who will r...He should recuse so it can go to Moore, who will really hammer them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-51537050371474008862012-06-06T18:09:44.727-04:002012-06-06T18:09:44.727-04:00when in doubt, kill the messenger!
http://www.dai...when in doubt, kill the messenger!<br /><br />http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/PubArticleDBR.jsp?id=1202558175168&Prosecutors_want_Judge_Gold_off_remanded_misconduct_caseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-91614138120902674812012-06-06T17:25:49.927-04:002012-06-06T17:25:49.927-04:00How can you say that the prosecutor disclosed the ...How can you say that the prosecutor disclosed the evidence when upon learning about it. It seems the pros learned about it on 4/20 but only disclosed the Skype chats to the defense on 5/2 after the client testified.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-45231828852552108022012-06-06T16:42:04.751-04:002012-06-06T16:42:04.751-04:00to be fair, reading the response the prosecution a...to be fair, reading the response the prosecution appears to have disclosed the evidence when they learned of it. the agents involved, however, may have been unaware or hiding their relevance even though they should have known of it. so the judge is probably still right, but this may not be a case of dirty pool on the prosecutor's part.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-74623480617655646392012-06-06T16:39:53.188-04:002012-06-06T16:39:53.188-04:00to be fair, reading the response, the prosecutor i...to be fair, reading the response, the prosecutor informed the defense of the communications when they learned of them. the agents, on the other hand, may have been either unaware or hiding the relevance of the chats.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-20612182562752808552012-06-06T14:29:10.856-04:002012-06-06T14:29:10.856-04:00As more time passes, I continue to lose faith that...As more time passes, I continue to lose faith that prosecutors are behaving ethically, or even care about justice. The government should not behave so as to transform court of law into conviction factories.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-63042297983592188702012-06-06T11:28:16.176-04:002012-06-06T11:28:16.176-04:00Great work by both lawyers.Great work by both lawyers.Bob Becerranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-58037803173154728922012-06-06T11:18:21.987-04:002012-06-06T11:18:21.987-04:00David,
I agree that the defense needs to be conf...David, <br /><br />I agree that the defense needs to be confronted with information that the government might intend to use at trial. That obligation, however, does not mean that it needs to identify to the defense what it might consider "relevant or important." If the information is disclosed in a usable and accessibile format, it is not the government's job to the work for the defense and identify "relevant and important" information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com