tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post4668078262960474435..comments2024-03-27T14:54:46.050-04:00Comments on Southern District of Florida Blog: The Great DissentersDavid Oscar Markushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18386723948607633980noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-18322842656431161982015-08-05T14:29:25.555-04:002015-08-05T14:29:25.555-04:00Your concurrence with the majority is noted. Of co...Your concurrence with the majority is noted. Of course, it takes at least 2 idiots to birth a shitty opinion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-52077106103042256542015-08-05T09:16:56.848-04:002015-08-05T09:16:56.848-04:008:48:
Your comment was elitist, self-congratulato...8:48:<br /><br />Your comment was elitist, self-congratulatory, obtuse and sucky as well. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-10313917220739751862015-08-04T20:48:49.582-04:002015-08-04T20:48:49.582-04:00Because this post was elitist, self-congratulatory...Because this post was elitist, self-congratulatory, obtuse and sucky, I dissent. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9615048.post-77564589349792018112015-08-04T19:55:45.476-04:002015-08-04T19:55:45.476-04:00Perhaps Justice Blackmun in Bowers v. Hardwick, 47...Perhaps Justice Blackmun in Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986):<br /><br />"This case is no more about 'a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy,' as the Court purports to declare, than Stanley v. Georgia (1969), was about a fundamental right to watch obscene movies, or Katz v. United States (1967), was about a fundamental right to place interstate bets from a telephone booth. Rather, this case is about 'the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men,' namely, 'the right to be let alone.' ... I can only hope that ... the Court soon will reconsider its analysis and conclude that depriving individuals of the right to choose for themselves how to conduct their intimate relationships poses a far greater threat to the values most deeply rooted in our Nation's history than tolerance of nonconformity could ever do. Because I think the Court today betrays those values, I dissent." <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com